Speed Finder

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Of course with right angle finders, you have to put your eye right up to it while the action finders are intended to have your eye much farther away.
Yes of course. For some uses there is no chance to put the eye at the eyepiece and thus there is a need for such optical sports finder, but with macro work and such it is "just" a matter of comfort. And a right-angle finder can still be used facing upwards when the camera is in portait orientation. Not all optical sports finder that can do this.
 

Fixcinater

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
2,500
Location
San Diego, CA
Format
Medium Format
I have a Speed Finder for my F1n, it's lovely to use as I wear glasses. I haven't found a reasonably priced one for my New F1 with the special rubber eye cup but I am looking as it is that much better than a normal finder for me. Not too much more bulk considering how big the lenses for this system are.

I threw that camera onto that giant 1200mm I got a while back and my nieces were very impressed looking at the moon. Not quite a telescope but great view and very accessible with the camera down at their level (think 3-5 year old) with the finder rotated as if it were a WLF.
 
OP
OP

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,222
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
-Wow..!!!.....you have a 1200mm lens.?
What a beast, do you hand-hold it.?
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
800
Location
Torino, Italy
Format
Large Format
The manuals lists their "official" description - Canon New F-1 lists it as "Speed" finder, Nikon F3 has it as "Action" finder and Pentax has it as "Action" finder. Obviously the word speed, action or sports all imply the same thing.

I disagree with your final conclusion I'm afraid: action finder and speedfinder refer to the same type of finder, but a sportsfinder is a completely different type of finder, as already pointed out by others.
 
Last edited:

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Let's say, sports finder indicates its general function, if necessary one can add optical or wire-frame.

Yes, with sports finder I immediately thought of a wire frame finder, but things evolve and thus a optical finder may called so too. I also used the term wire frame finder for finders that got no wire any more at all.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
I disagree with your final conclusion I'm afraid: action finder and speedfinder refer to the same type of finder, but a sportsfinder is a completely different type of finder, as already pointed out by others.

I said the word itself - speed, action or sports, all imply the same thing but not that the designations "action finder" and "speedfinder" are the same types of finders. I agree that the official designations used by the manufacturer should always be used.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I would love to have that Canon finder... but so far none showed up at the rummage boxes I frequented, nor the new-F1, which I am "lacking" too.

Thus you fellow canny savers, do you use wire-frame finders of any kind on your SLRs ?
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Weird, as I do not get the idea behind Rolleimeter.
I mean, the idea behind an optical sports finder is to enable off-eypiece viewing (as with the wire frame) but still with information the ground glass of a reflex camera is yielding.
The best I can think of in thise case is the idea to add the often praised benefits of a rangefinder camera to a reflex camera.
Could someone make me wiser?
 

TeeSquare

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
10
Format
Multi Format
I love the Sport Finder on a Nikon F, F2, F3, F4 and F5!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…