Submarine transport was a rarity and used for high-tech armament knowledge/material transfer between the two countries
Not for trade goods. (And already on the former scepticism should be applied.)
If you got contrary sources, I would appreciate learning about.
Seems strange that the exposure information is in English if the Germans were exporting to China as neither country speaks English.
Hong Kong?
Seems strange that the exposure information is in English if the Germans were exporting to China as neither country speaks English.
Seems strange that the exposure information is in English if the Germans were exporting to China as neither country speaks English.
I'm also very sceptical of submarines transporting Leica's etc. to Japan during the war. There is a myth that an entire Tiger tank was sent to Japan by submarine, in truth it was a set of blueprints since there was no way to transport parts for a 56 ton tank in a sub. However Japan did buy a Tiger and went to Germany to inspect it, but it was eventually requisitioned and remained in Germany and France during the war. Interestingly Germany shafted the Japanese by charging double the price for it, some allies! And I think this is what we are seeing in the Leica, Rolleiflex, etc. rumours, the Japanese were desperate for access to German technology, especially steel production know how, but it was limited to blueprints and similar technical documents. The Japanese soldiers who went to Germany to pose for pictures in their Tiger may well have taken a Rolleiflex or Leica back with them, but it wasn't trade as such.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?