Some New Azo Prints

Cycling with wife #2

D
Cycling with wife #2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 15
Time's up!

A
Time's up!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 12
Green room

A
Green room

  • 4
  • 2
  • 62
On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 5
  • 0
  • 81
Sinclair Lewis

A
Sinclair Lewis

  • 6
  • 1
  • 90

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,232
Messages
2,771,422
Members
99,580
Latest member
Estherson
Recent bookmarks
0

bennoj

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
98
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format
Got out a few weeks ago with some "new" cameras - an ICA 10x15 plate camera and a Voigtlaender Avus 9x12. Finally managed to get in and print them and these three are the best of what I shot, one with the ICA and 2 with the Avus. I tried when shooting to shoot what seemed to be more intimate shots with the smaller negatives than I might shoot with my 8x10. Comments welcome....
 

Attachments

  • Stairs_01.jpg
    Stairs_01.jpg
    72.6 KB · Views: 343
  • Bark_01.jpg
    Bark_01.jpg
    75.6 KB · Views: 296
  • Flower_01.jpg
    Flower_01.jpg
    56.9 KB · Views: 309

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format
bennoj said:
Got out a few weeks ago with some "new" cameras - an ICA 10x15 plate camera and a Voigtlaender Avus 9x12. Finally managed to get in and print them and these three are the best of what I shot, one with the ICA and 2 with the Avus. I tried when shooting to shoot what seemed to be more intimate shots with the smaller negatives than I might shoot with my 8x10. Comments welcome....


I agree with your impression that small negatives can produce very intimate photographs when contact printed. Azo is a wonderful paper. I know that a scan is a poor representation of the actual print. My impression in viewing the scans of your prints is that the overall scale is slightly compressed. Were these printed on grade two Azo? If so that may account for what I observed...or it may just be that the scans are not up to the print values. Grade two Azo requires a density range of 1.65 to 1.75.

On the subject of small contact prints, I observed a small contact print produced by Imogene Cunningham that was displayed at the Camera Obscura in Denver, Colorado. That print was offered for sale at $2,500. Also last winter, as I recall, another small contact was sold at an auction in NYC for $105,000. So large prints are not always the better way to go.

Good work thanks for sharing.

Donald Miller
 

juan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
2,706
Location
St. Simons I
Format
Multi Format
I have a miniature Speed Graphic and a Graflex, both 2 1/4 x 3 1/4. I contact the prints from both cameras. I find myself, as you do, taking closer, more intimate photographs than I would take with the 8x10.

Thanks for sharing your work.
juan
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom