Soliciting opinions of RB shooters - 50mm/4.5 lens

St. Clair Beach Solitude

D
St. Clair Beach Solitude

  • 7
  • 2
  • 90
Reach for the sky

H
Reach for the sky

  • 3
  • 4
  • 128
Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 3
  • 2
  • 163

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,873
Messages
2,782,341
Members
99,737
Latest member
JackZZ
Recent bookmarks
0

nyoung

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
388
Format
Medium Format
Been doing some testing on a new - to me - 50mm/4.5 lens. It started me wondering what the RB shooters here consider the optimal aperture for this lens in terms of sharpness at the corners, flare, barrel distortion etc. etc.
Don't be shy, I know everyone has an opinion so share it with the group.
 

BetterSense

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
I've been shooting mine mostly handheld at apertures less than f/8. I haven't been that impressed. I find it annoying to adjust the floating element ring, especially since the camera gives no usable distance readout for you to use...the 50mm distance scale is too imprecise to be useful, so I just have to guess the distance, and half the time I forget.
 

EdSawyer

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
1,793
Format
Multi Format
f/8 and f/11 are the sharpest before diffraction sets in.
 

Neil Grant

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
543
Location
area 76
Format
Multi Format
I've been shooting mine mostly handheld at apertures less than f/8. I haven't been that impressed. I find it annoying to adjust the floating element ring, especially since the camera gives no usable distance readout for you to use...the 50mm distance scale is too imprecise to be useful, so I just have to guess the distance, and half the time I forget.

Do you mean f/ numbers less than f/8 (eg f/5.6) or smaller diaphragm openings (eg f/11) It's just not clear. Guessing the distance on the floating ring is good enough - but you're right to say it's easy to forget. I mostly use f/16 for d-o-f. Distortion doesn't change when stopping down and the lens can just cover the 6x8 format - if you've got all the right bits.
 

mr. mohaupt

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Messages
89
Location
NC
Format
Medium Format
Oh man great thread. I really want this lens, well this or the 65. I didn't realize that the floating element needed to be adjusted to get accurate focusing. Does the 65 have this?

To those that have both which do you find yourself using more? I will probably shoot a handful of landscapes but a lot of "environmental portraits." On my 35mm system my favorite combo is the 17-35 and the 70-200.

Thanks!
~M
 

Maris

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
1,571
Location
Noosa, Australia
Format
Multi Format
I use a Mamiya RB67 with a 50mm f4.5 lens for most of my landscape photography. The apertures with the most detail for "deep" subjects are f22 and f32 because the generous depth of field eliminates those nasty out of focus areas. The aperture with the finest detail is half way between f8 and f11 for the centre of the image.

The floating element is worth ignoring for ordinary field work. I just set it half way. However if you are doing close-ups of flat art-work at maximum aperture then adjusting the floating element does give you perceptibly (but not dramatically) finer detail in the corners of the image.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom