- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 869
- Format
- 4x5 Format
127 film is still available and I develop mine in an Kodak 620 tank that has an apron ~ 2 /14" x 5 feet long. You wind the film up in thee apron and still it in the tank.
Yeah, the reels I got with my no-name tank do 127.I got a bunch of tanks that can do 127.
Any Paterson type reel will hold 127 -- that's the notch in the adjustment between 35 mm and 120.
Yep, the Sawyers Mk. IV is one of the best 127 cameras ever made, and it's very easy to make 127 from 120 (though this camera's counter probably won't give the 18 frames that will physically fit on a 120 length strip). If I had money...
I don't think the Sawyers Mk. IV counter will do 18 -- the original film was 12, that's probably all the counter is made for and then it'll freewheel to let you wind through the tail paper. I was saying a 120 roll left full length when it's cut down to 127 will make 18 4x4 frames with a length-counting frame counter that accommodates that. It'll be 16 frames with red window 4x4, because you'll be using the 6x4.5 framing track (not an option with the Sawyers, I believe; the red window is on the 4x6.5 8-exposure track). I have, however, gotten 18 with recut 120 in a Bantam RF (828) with its mechanical frame stop; same frame width as 4x4 127 (28x40 for 828).
It *might* be possible to reset the Sawyers counter mid-roll (as I can do with my Kodak Reflex II, if I ever come into some 220 I really want to try), but that's dependent on the frame counter using a friction roller drive vs. counting turns of the spool like, say, Graflex 22 and 23 roll film holders or my Super Ikonta B.
How long is a roll of 127?
Well, it's 12 exposures of 4x4, or 8 of 4x6, plus a little margin at head and tail and the space between frames. Looks like the 8-on would take 48 cm plus those margins, so roughly 54+ cm = 22 or so inches, vs. 36+ inches for 120. Hence why you can get 18 frames on 120 length, with a suitable mechanical frame stop.
By my measurements 127 film is 25" long
The Prrimo/Sawyers is one of my favorite 127 cameras. (Been shooting 127 since I got my Brownie Starmite in 1962.) The Rollei Baby has some very nice glass, but the complicated interlocking functions designed into it make it a bear to fix and also make it prone to failure. The Primo is mechanically simpler and therefore more reliable. I saw how cheap these were a decade or so ago and had a 127 GAS attack, so I now have 11 of them. Probably six are in good working order--the rest have shutter issues, and given the tiny size are not likely to get fixed, at least not by me. I bought up multiple 100-foot rolls of 46mm color stock a few years ago when you still could, and I always sign up for the Ilford ULF/bizarre format film sale every year to replenish my stock of HP5. If you don't want to roll your own, check out The Frugal Photographer: https://frugalphotographer.com. He sells fresh Portra 400 for 127 cameras as well as 110 and APS.
Edit: December 7 is 127 Day. http://127film.blogspot.com
I feel like I should have gone for this camera instead of the Rolleicord III.
I have that same problem -- spent my allowance, else I'd have been messaging instead of posting about these great little cameras. BTW, another thing 4x4 can do is make extra-large slides that still fit a standard 2x2 mount...
Worth trying. You're right that there's a follower up there in the takeup chamber--a toothed roller that turns a shaft connected to the frame counting mechanism as the film advances. That silver switch above the crank resets the counter, so maybe tripping that after you've wound up frame no. 12 would buy you more frames. There might be an overlap issue between the 12th and 13th frames but that should be manageable.I did look at some pictures of the film chamber on eBay and it appears the Sawyers Mk. IV uses a friction roller to drive the counter, so it's at least possible that you could reset the counter to 1 after advancing to frame 7 and actually get 18 frames on a roll of cut 120.
I have the ability to slit my own 127 film and backing paper. Sadly I spent my budget on a Rolliecord III recently. If I hadn't I would seriously consider picking this up.
The Rolleicord III is a nice little camera. I sent mine to Mark Hansen and had him do a CLA and install a Rick Oleson screen in it. Super smooth and great finder now. Mark said it's his favorite Rolleicord camera. Pretty easy to use and small and light. Lens is no slouch.
Except you haveNot to hijack this guys sales thread...
Is there some sort of device that screws into a cable release socket and turns it into a shutter button. I'm not a fan of the shutter lever on the Rollei3.
... Probably six are in good working order--the rest have shutter issues, and given the tiny size are not likely to get fixed, at least not by me.
Edit: December 7 is 127 Day. http://127film.blogspot.com
Except you have.
Your question is worth its own thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?