I know Photoshop quite well from my college years + web stuff, image editing for the web, etc. I am familiar with various core options such as levels, sharpening, masking, etc. I am now using Capture One v23, which compared to photoshop feels next generation. The workflow on these new gen tools in dizzyingly fast and you don't feel like you need 10yrs to get your head around it.
I am not one to spend hours editing an image. I try to get the capture pretty dang close, then fall to some essential core techniques in Capture one to finish it off (levels, exposure adjustments, and maybe 4-5 other options). I have a 1080p 24" ProArt display that seems to get the color accuracy on point. Now that I know what works for my taste in Capture One, I can get a result I am happy with in about 10mins if the image capture is solid, 20-30min if it needs major surgery, but beyond that, I feel the capture is less true to itself and a bit of a failure if it takes THAT much tweaking with an advanced tool.
Some may balk at the speed of this work, in comparison it could take me an entire day to get a solid print in my darkroom. But on the other hand, when you are short on time like me, being able to keep it simple and get results you are happy with is a win.
I seem ok with color work, but B&W digital looks to be a huge rabbit hole to go down and difficult to compete with traditional work. For now, due to being so time poor, I will stick to color.
I'm curious about others' digital workflows. Are you a fast worker, or do you spend hours or days per image?
'Perfect' is the biggest enemy of 'good enough'.
And "good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
'Perfect' is the biggest enemy of 'good enough'.
And "good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
I'm pretty sure CS6 applications still need to be authenticated online, at least initially. So if you were to locate a copy somewhere, make sure the serial number has been deactivated by the previous owner/user. And the current CS applications do not necessarily store anything on the cloud, all can be local.I disagree. When I signed up to rent LightRoom and PhotoShop Classic I checked and verified that PhotoShop Classic did not use the cloud and would not allow Abode to touch my negatives outside my computer.
You've got my curiosity. I've never heard of Photoshop Classic, so I googled it - what I found is Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic, which seems to be a subscription program.
The bottom line, though - if you can find copy of Photoshop CS6 (It's not subscription - it is the last version before Cloud versions.) it should run on an older mac (OS Sierra or earlier, like mine). It would be on a DVD and likely still available, but not from Adobe.
Interestingly, you prioritize speed over extensive editing. Do you find that your images still maintain the quality you're looking for? Sometimes, a little extra time can yield significant improvements.
I'm pretty new to digital photography. I bought my first digital camera, a Nikon Z5, in July 2022. It's complicated. It has complex hierarchical menus. It has its own ideas about where, when and how to focus. There's been so much to learn. It's been invigorating, and kinda frustrating and a little humbling. I've looked at a handful of the files in Nikon's (free) NX Studio software and poked around a little bit but the reality is that I haven't really done any editing at all. I take photos, periodically copy the files from the memory card to a couple of USB attached external SSDs, have some printed, maybe upload a few to flickr and pretty much that's it. Sometimes, I'll transfer a few to the iPhone to share with friends and family via txt message.
I've just recently started making video. I want to learn how to edit video - if only to be able to splice clips together and cut out segments of boring stuff. Looks like this can be done in NX Studio too but I need a bigger, faster computer.
Davinci has a free version and is very capable.
I'm pretty new to digital photography. I bought my first digital camera, a Nikon Z5, in July 2022. It's complicated. It has complex hierarchical menus. It has its own ideas about where, when and how to focus. There's been so much to learn. It's been invigorating, and kinda frustrating and a little humbling. I've looked at a handful of the files in Nikon's (free) NX Studio software and poked around a little bit but the reality is that I haven't really done any editing at all. I take photos, periodically copy the files from the memory card to a couple of USB attached external SSDs, have some printed, maybe upload a few to flickr and pretty much that's it. Sometimes, I'll transfer a few to the iPhone to share with friends and family via txt message.
I've just recently started making video. I want to learn how to edit video - if only to be able to splice clips together and cut out segments of boring stuff. Looks like this can be done in NX Studio too but I need a bigger, faster computer.
How does it compare to Adobe Light Room and PhotoShop Classic.
Davinci has a free version and is very capable.
Davinci is for editing video. I was suggesting it as a better alternative to the bundled software BradS is using.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?