So, what is standard agitation (for small tank)?

.JL.

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2007
Messages
3
Location
Toronto
Format
35mm RF
At the end it's whatever that works best, but as a starting/reference point, which of the following two agitation methods is considered "standard"?

From Ilford's Information Leaflet "Processing Your First Black&White Film"; this seems to be the same as MDC's guide

From Kodak XTOL datasheet
 

fhovie

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
1,250
Location
Powell Wyoming
Format
Large Format
St Ansel recommended continuous agitation for 30 seconds initially - That make sense to me. Many sources state 10 seconds every minute - For years, I have used 5 seconds every 30 seconds - or almost no agitation at all! (Long story there) More will give you more contrast. Too little will both underdevelop and create compensation in highlights - (unless you extend the time) Too vigerous agitation will cause uneven develoment - Too gentle agitation may cause uneven development but more likely it will cause a drop in contrast and insuffient development as a worst case scenario.

With larger tanks and many liters of developer greater care is needed that single rolls in a small tank. Agitaion serves to replace exhausted developer from the surface of the film - shortening the time and increasing the contrast. Pick a method that you like and as long as there are no problems - your answer will be the right answer. - just be consistant.
 

PhotoJim

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2005
Messages
2,314
Location
Regina, SK, CA
Format
35mm
As long as you're consistent, it doesn't terribly matter (within the bounds of reasonableness).

I invert constantly for 30 seconds, then do five inversions in 5 seconds every 30 seconds. The only exception is if I use PMK, when I shake the tank fairly violently for about 3-4 seconds every 15 seconds. Once I forgot and used my old inversion system and I couldn't notice any difference, but I'd have to do further tests to know for sure. (The creator of the formula recommends the more rapid, violent agitation.)
 

Roger Hicks

Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
4,895
Location
Northern Aqu
Format
35mm RF
As long as you're consistent, it doesn't terribly matter (within the bounds of reasonableness).

And the differences are not all that great anyway, until you agitate more than about 50% of the time (bigger grain, more speed, reduced sharpness) or less than about 2% (smaller grain, less speed, increased sharpness) -- all for a constant time, of course, though the effects will still be there if you increase/decrease time for a constant contrast). Yes, consistent agitation is a good idea, but as you say, exactly which regime you use doesn't matter a whole hell of a lot.

Cheers,

R.
 

Gary Holliday

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
824
Location
Belfast, UK
Format
Medium Format
Agitate for the first 30s
Let stand for 30s
Agitate tank gently for 5s (2 inversions) every 30s.

This is a fairly standard method and 100% safe without any developing problems. As mentioned above..be consistent!
 

Snapshot

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
I'm wondering how twist agitation translate to inversions (e.g. does one 180 degree back and forth twist equal one inversion?).
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
like a slow-mobius (sideways-figure-8 while turning the tank )
for 10 seconds every minute,
after doing it constantly for the first minute ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mcgrattan

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
505
Location
Oxford, Engl
Format
Medium Format
Yeah, I do the 3 slow inversions every 60 seconds thing too. Which happens to take me around 10 seconds.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…