• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Smallest TLR? Autocord? Rolleicord?

The Lubitel is very capable in terms of image quality. Where it suffer is focusing. I've not found a reliable way to focus using the loupe and finder. Rather I did some controlled testing with the taking lens and marked off 3, 4 and 6 feet. So I zone focus, and that works. Sometimes.

Lately, I've been playing with an old Brownie Hawkeye, which might be the smallest and lightest of everything mentioned thus far. You trade control for portability. I flipped the lens in mine just to make things fun.
 
Oh man, do i suffer from GAS in this thread; Voigtlander Focusing Brillant / Nikon 35Ti /that Welta isn't bad either / this Tessina !! Would you please stop? Wasn't there a similar camera in "Spy who came in from the cold" ?? the cord is the distance meter? or......
 
Last edited:
The Autocord is really compact and nicely built, I think its much underrated.
 
momus said:
Voigtlander Focusing Brillant. Might take you a year or two to find one w/ a Heliar lens, and it will eat a Hasselblad for lunch. Should never have sold mine.
Click to expand...
Oooh just found a Heliar lensed Brilliant on ebay for considerably less than the lens and shutter normally goes for. Something tells me the seller didn't know quite what they had (I suspect they may guess as I bought it under 5 min from they listed it ;-) )but I'm not complaining!
 
Last edited:
These take 120 film...all you have to do is cut the film into thin strips...
 
momus said:
Voigtlander Focusing Brillant. Might take you a year or two to find one w/ a Heliar lens, and it will eat a Hasselblad for lunch. Should never have sold mine.
Click to expand...

I've been looking myself -- hope springs eternal!
 
My vote for Lubitel or Richoflex VIIIXXXX or whatever. Capable cameras although the Richo tends to vignette a bit more than I'd like. The Lube is sharp stopped down, the focusing can be tough though.
 
I am not going to claim "smallest" but I am constantly amazed at the small size and light weight of my superb Rolleiflex Automat. It is noticeably lighter than my other Rolleiflex and THAT is also considered light for a medium format camera.
 
I just put a roll of Delta 100 through an Autocord that I was going to put up for sale to a friend. Now I've got seller's remorse before I even pack it up!

Beautiful negatives, by far the best I've seen out of any TLR besides a Planar Rollei.
 
I dont know about absolutely the smallest, but in practical terms the Lubitel scores pretty well. Although its viewfinder is...peculiar and ackward it makes for a very decent scalefocus f/16-and-there camera.
 
locutus said:
I dont know about absolutely the smallest, but in practical terms the Lubitel scores pretty well. Although its viewfinder is...peculiar and ackward it makes for a very decent scalefocus f/16-and-there camera.
Click to expand...
Yes, but the Lubitel shines when wide open -- or one stop off. When things work out, they work out beautifully, but it can be a frustrating little camera to work with.
 
My hit rate with focussing it at f/4.5 or f/5.6 has been so low that I don't bother, 120 is a bit too expensive per shot to waste on 90% misfocused shots...IMHO
 
locutus said:
My hit rate with focussing it at f/4.5 or f/5.6 has been so low that I don't bother, 120 is a bit too expensive per shot to waste on 90% misfocused shots...IMHO
Click to expand...
You're right! I've lost a lot of shots too. I went as far as to put a piece of ground glass over the back of the camera (on the film plane), focus on a target, and mark off distances along the viewing lens barrel. This helps, but sometimes requires me to take along a tape measure when composing shots...
 
Last edited:
There as got to be a reason why so many makers incorporated the word "flex" in to their funny named offerings.
 
Malinku said:
Super ricohflex is pretty small and can be found Cheap. when Im not shooting my big old mamiya out comes my ricohflex. A nice retangle of metal with a very nice lens imo
Click to expand...

+1.
Super Ricohflexes are known for having nice lenses - even though they are triplet lenses. The issue with these is that the grease that Ricoh used to lube the focusing mechanism on the lenses has turned into something akin to loc-tite. The one I bought on the big auction site had a missing roller and the focus was seized up. Mark Hansen had one ready to go (he likes to use these cameras too), so I was able to send mine to him + what he would've charged to fix mine up, and he sent me the one he had ready to go.

For an example of what the Super Ricohflex can do, check out my (color) entry for the Jan-Feb 2017 Monthly Shooting Assignment. (there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

Mamiya C220/330 are way bigger than Rolleiflexes/Yashicamats etc. Not a little bigger, a lot bigger.
 
Check out the Ikoflex cameras. Excellent lenses and very small
 
When the urge to 'come back' to MF arose some six years ago, weight was very much a factor. Memories of the Mamiya C3 I lugged about in the mid '70s pointed me in the direction of something less brick-like. After quite a lot of research I settled on a Rolleicord and bought a '63 (or '64) Vb. Lightweight with excellent lens plus bright split-prism screen, it is a delight to use. And the results are not too bad either

 
Huss said:
Mamiya C220/330 are way bigger than Rolleiflexes/Yashicamats etc. Not a little bigger, a lot bigger.
Click to expand...

But a C220 is light enough. And very versatile.
 
Harry Stevens said:
There as got to be a reason why so many makers incorporated the word "flex" in to their funny named offerings.
Click to expand...

"Flex" because of the reFLEX finder, as opposed as cameras with rangefinders or cameras with regular (i.e. albada) viewfinders.
 
The smallest TLR is a Hasselblad SLR.
 

Lovely photos.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register