Smallest reflex system?

makanakijones

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
67
Format
35mm
May be I am looking for an impossible camera:
- Smallest film reflex avalaible.
- Superb optics.
- Very quiet shutter sound (not very far from my leica).
- Almost spot metering.
- Not rare batteries.
 

frdrx

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
156
Location
Just outside
Format
Multi Format
The only one I can think of is the Contax S2b. Or the Contax 139Q if you can live with centre-weighted, albeit very good, metering.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,977
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
I'm looking for a deaf and dumb nymphomaniac who owns a liquor store, but in answer to you're question the nearest thing available IMHO is the Olympus OM4.
 
OP
OP

makanakijones

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
67
Format
35mm
Well, then I have to make a point: Non useless smallest 35 reflex system avalaible?
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,110
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Olympus OM, Pentax ME or Nikon FG.


Steve.
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
makanakijones said:
May be I am looking for an impossible camera:
- Smallest film reflex avalaible.
- Superb optics.
- Very quiet shutter sound (not very far from my leica).
- Almost spot metering.
- Not rare batteries.
Click to expand...
***********
Olympus Pen F slr
 

elekm

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
2,055
Location
New Jersey (
Format
35mm RF
The Pen F is somewhat wide, and the shutter is noisy. Originally took the PX13 mercury battery, which is no longer available (works great with hearing-aid batteries).

Great piece of engineering, however.

The Tessina with a chimney finder might fit the bill, although it isn't full frame.

But basically, what you want doesn't exist. And there is a point where an SLR can be too small.

The Yashica/Kyocera Contax cameras are well made, and the Carl Zeiss lenses are outstanding. The Minolta XD11 has a well-damped shutter and is among the cameras that were part of the mid-1970s downsizing that occurred (led by Olympus).
 

Jesper

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2009
Messages
878
Location
Sweden
Format
Multi Format
As has been said, when it comes down to size the Pentax auto 110 is hard to beat.
 

Mark Fisher

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2003
Messages
1,691
Location
Chicago
Format
Medium Format
If you want the smallest 35mm with all those features, you must be looking for an OM4T with the associated small lenses, The 110 cameras are smaller, but getting common batteries are the least of your problems!
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Smallest practical system will be Olympus OM's. They're compact and reasonably quiet.
The Pen F is more compact but the sound is sharper & IMO noticeable. It's also 1/2 frame
so to get a similar size enlargement the grain would be more obvious.
Effective focal length of the lenses will be different be cause of the smaller format the same
as digital sensors.
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,460
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
Peter de Groot said:
I would recommend the Olympus ME Super. I have one of those and I like it a lot. Got a nice little kit together. Only need a 24 mm wide angle lens with it. Or 35 would be nice to.
Click to expand...

Olympus OM-n, Pentax ME Super...you mixed them up, or are you using a home brewed b*stard unit?!
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,350
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The Olympus OM2s also offers a "spot" metering function, although it isn't as refined as in the OM4 or OM4T.

Matt
 

Pumal

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
580
Format
Multi Format
OLYMPUS
I favor the OM-1 and OM4T
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,959
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
My OM-1 and OM-4 are both smaller than my Contax 139Q, and the OM-1 weighs one ounce less with the winder-2 attached compared to the Contax with winder. If the 110 format was still viable, then the Pentax 110 would far and away beat almost everything on the market.

Rick
 

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
OM10 weighs even less - but it is a bit bigger than the OM1.

Lots of people put 'em down but I've got 3 OM10's (along with 4 OM1's) and they are robust and handy little cams. Very cheap right now. Take great pics.
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,959
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
I've owned 2 OM-10's--bought one for my(ex)wife and one to fill in for my OM-1 they are trash and not worth owning. Neither of mine lived longer than a year. By comparison, my Om-1 was purchased new in 1982, OM-4 in 1985, OM-10's in 1983, replaced by OM-4 and tossed both 10's in the trash can. Still shoot the OM-1, the OM-4 is headed to the shop for CLA.

Rick
 

frdrx

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
156
Location
Just outside
Format
Multi Format

No doubt the OM4 is a superior machine. But are you sure that the OMs are smaller than the 139Q (without winders attached)? I have never seed an Olympus and a Contax side by side, but I found the following dimensions and weights in the specifications (Wikipedia and the Contax 139Q manual, respectively):

Contax 139Q: 85.5 mm x 135 mm x 50 mm, 500 g
Olympus OM4: 87 mm x 139 mm x 50 mm, 540 g
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,350
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

If these dimensions don't include the lenses, this comparison may not answer the question.

The Olympus Zuiko lenses contribute greatly to the small size of the system.

Matt
 

frdrx

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
156
Location
Just outside
Format
Multi Format
MattKing said:
If these dimensions don't include the lenses, this comparison may not answer the question.

The Olympus Zuiko lenses contribute greatly to the small size of the system.

Matt
Click to expand...

Of course. It is true that Contax lenses aren't particularly small, possibly with the exception of the 45 mm Tessar.
 

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
ralnphot said:
...tossed both 10's in the trash can.
Click to expand...

Off topic but for community info, OM10 prisms are identical replacements for the OM1.

Many OM1s suffer the 'green-gunge' prism problem from melted foam. I have fixed a few OM1s with OM10 donor prisms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…