small 270-300mm lens.

Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 1
  • 58
Oak

A
Oak

  • 1
  • 0
  • 47
High st

A
High st

  • 9
  • 0
  • 80
Flap

D
Flap

  • 0
  • 0
  • 30

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,224
Messages
2,788,128
Members
99,836
Latest member
Candler_Park
Recent bookmarks
0

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,153
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Hello all. It's been a while since ive done any LF but i am planning to get back into it now that it is cooler.

I am looking for a small lens for the long end of my Shen-Hao HCX-iia.
It just barely extends to 360mm so I was hoping for a 300mm or something slightly shorter like 270mm.
It seems like most of these are made for 8x10 cameras so they are big. I cannot find much info for small, light lenses in this range.
What do you suggest?
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
There were some very compact lenses made by Fuji and Nikkor. Then there are the original Dagor-type Symmars, the Goerz Dagors, and the f:6.3 Tessars. All will be much smaller and lighter than a modern Plasmat type.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,273
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
The 300mm f9 Nikon M is a nice lens, however any 5x4 camear with the necessary bellows extension tends to be prone to instability in terms of vibration/image sharpness. This is why many prefer to use a 270mm Tele lens.

Ian
 

Steve Goldstein

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
1,769
Location
Northeastern US
Format
Multi Format
The Docter Apo-Germinar 9/300 in Copal 1 is a little smaller and lighter than the Nikkor-M, but uncommon. There was one for sale recently on the Large Format Forum, I don't recall offhand if it's sold.

There's the 9/270 G-Claron, though you might have better luck finding hens' teeth. And a 270mm Computar or Kowa-Graphic, more like dinosaur teeth.

Fuji made two 250s. The f/6.7, with a 398mm image circle, is complete overkill for 4x5. The newer f/6.3 came in two versions, both of which cover a bit more than the minimum for 8x10. I don't know about their weight, all three came in Copal 1 shutters. But then 250 is might close to 240, and you've probably already got one of those.

And Ian raises a very good point about stability...
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
270mm f9 Schneider G-Claron is superb and in Copal 1 shutter. The early version "Dagor type" is the equivalent of a Gold Dot Dagor, except f9. They are hard to find. Later version is a plasmat, and also very nice, but bigger. Both would be Copal 1, but the Dagor type was a 55mm filter iirc and the plasmat would be 62. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Another really superb lens, but even harder to find is the Red Dot Artar 10 3/4" in Compur shutter.
 

Steve Goldstein

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
1,769
Location
Northeastern US
Format
Multi Format
Jim, according to some PDFs I got from the Schneider site the 270mm Dagor version takes 49mm filters and the Plasmat takes 58mm filters.
 
OP
OP
darinwc

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,153
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Sounds like a 270mm lens may be hard to find..
So it looks like a 300mm is my best bet. Are there any problems with using extension lensboards?
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
Jim, according to some PDFs I got from the Schneider site the 270mm Dagor version takes 49mm filters and the Plasmat takes 58mm filters.

Yep, that sounds right.
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
I've a 250mm Carl Meyer that's cheap and small and pretty. In Alphax 3 which is tiny bit bulkier than a Copal 1
 
OP
OP
darinwc

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,153
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Did kodak make a 300mm f7.7 dialyte lens like their 203mm Ektar?
What shutter does the Commercial Ektar f6.3 300mm use?
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format

Leigh B

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2011
Messages
2,059
Location
Maryland, USA
Format
Multi Format
The smallest one in my database is the Fujinon C 300/8.5, weighing only 250g.

It has a gigantic 380mm IC, but takes tiny 52mm filters. Overall length is 44.9mm, in a Copal #1 shutter.

- Leigh
 
OP
OP
darinwc

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,153
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Anything that fits in a copal 1 shutter will be perfect.
An Ilex 3 would be fine as well.
So far I have listed:
Nikkor M 300mm f/9
Fujinon C 300mm f/8.5
Schneider G-claron 305mm f/9
Goerz Artar 12" f/9 (?) is sometimes in a Ilex 3.

-OK, I will keep an eye out for these.


300mm Dagor - no
300mm Commercial Ektar - no
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom