hoffy
Member
Portrait photography is something that I want to get more into, so of late, I have been looking at a lot of websites, feeds and portfolios of those who shoot portraits, mainly on film.
The one thing that I have come to notice that when ever someone says they are do portraits, they actually mean portraits of attractive young females, in varying states of dress....
Now, while I don't have an issue with this, what so ever (& to be frank, given half a chance, I'd very much take portraits of a similar vein), it does make me wonder where all the portraits of normal folk exist?
Has it become that to promote your best wares as a portrait photographer, you have to resort to packing your portfolio full of models that are easy to the eye?
Or am I simply over looking them?
The one thing that I have come to notice that when ever someone says they are do portraits, they actually mean portraits of attractive young females, in varying states of dress....
Now, while I don't have an issue with this, what so ever (& to be frank, given half a chance, I'd very much take portraits of a similar vein), it does make me wonder where all the portraits of normal folk exist?
Has it become that to promote your best wares as a portrait photographer, you have to resort to packing your portfolio full of models that are easy to the eye?
Or am I simply over looking them?