• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Simple two-bath fixing question

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
3,051
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
This is a pretty simple question. I'm using Ilford Hypam 1:4 for two bath fixing for paper. 30 seconds in each bath. My question is does drain time count towards the time? I drain 8x10s for 10 sec, 11x14s or 15sec, and 16x20s for atleast 20sec.
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
10,031
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
I do 30 seconds then drain until dripping slows or stops, then move to next and repeat, then into a holding tray of water.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,409
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I've always used Hypam 1+9 for prints, that gives greater flexibility and economy when it comes to two bath fixing. At 1+4 it's quite an aggressive fixer and can bleach the highlights with some papers (particularly warm tone) if the times are exceeded.

Ian
 

Xmas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF

I use low concentration sodium thiosulphate A&B bath with a preacid acid stop, post hypo clear. I don't mind a longer time in fix baths, never detected loss of high light density, normally process for warmer tone.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,935
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
This is a pretty simple question. I'm using Ilford Hypam 1:4 for two bath fixing for paper. 30 seconds in each bath. My question is does drain time count towards the time? I drain 8x10s for 10 sec, 11x14s or 15sec, and 16x20s for atleast 20sec.

for tray processing,I'd say 'Yes.Fordrum processing,I'd argue 'No' because, the filling time just about equals the drain time,and therefore,what you gain on one end, you miss at the other.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,409
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I use low concentration sodium thiosulphate A&B bath with a preacid acid stop, post hypo clear. I don't mind a longer time in fix baths, never detected loss of high light density, normally process for warmer tone.

It's the Rapid fixers which are based on Ammonium Thiosulphate that will bleach the highlights, far less of a problem with Sodium Thiosulphate.

Ian
 

pdeeh

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,770
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
The Ilford archival processing sequence requires 1+4 for 30s only.
Is there any point or practical reason to try and combine that with a two-bath approach (presumably ~15s in each) or would that be more of a needless complication?
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,676
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format

I'm with Ian on this 100%.

Not only is timing an issue (do I subtract drain time or not?, is the drain time different for larger prints?, etc., etc.), but it's really too easy to leave a print in the fix for longer than 30 seconds, resulting in a subtle degradation of the highlights. And, you get less mileage from your fixer.

The only possible advantage is that, if you manage to fix your prints completely in the minimum time, the paper base is not entirely saturated with fixer and the wash times can be reduced. The problem here is that there is very little leeway in fixing time this way; if you leave the paper in the fix another few seconds past optimum, the paper base gets saturated requiring a bit longer wash. If you leave it in a few seconds to little, you under-fix...

I prefer to be sure and give a bit longer wash.

Best,

Doremus
 

miha

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
3,042
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
The Ilford archival processing sequence requires 1+4 for 30s only.
Is there any point or practical reason to try and combine that with a two-bath approach (presumably ~15s in each) or would that be more of a needless complication?

Single bath is only good for about 10 prints if you want "arhival", you can go much further with the second bath. BTW, it 60 seconds not 30.
 

pdeeh

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,770
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Quite right, I relied on memory instead of checking Ilford docs.
60s it is
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,935
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
The Ilford archival processing sequence requires 1+4 for 30s only.
Is there any point or practical reason to try and combine that with a two-bath approach (presumably ~15s in each) or would that be more of a needless complication?

anything shorter than 30s becomes hard to control and repeat consistenrly.
 

walbergb

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
429
Location
Brandon, Man
Format
Multi Format

That's been my thinking as well. I tend to fix for a few seconds longer, especially in the 1st fix bath. I use the Ilford sequence and my tests show that for my situation I have to add an extra 5 minutes to the final wash. I am intrigued with the process of using a 1+9 fixer concentration rather than the 1+4 that I have been using.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,801
Format
35mm RF
I use Hypam 1:9 for prints and 1:4 for film and only use a single bath, as do most of the colleges and universities I have visited or worked in. I fix RC paper for 2 minutes and film (non tabular) for 6 minutes.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,835
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I do not time the hypo time that closely. Thirty second to a minute and a half extra would not make much of a difference.