I think I'll visit B&H or Freestyle and get one of those.. Ha ha!
Actually a good substitute is available, in fact I'm building one now: https://github.com/srozum/film_camera_tester
Testing together two variables - meter accuracy and shutter accuracy - will drive you nuts. If the film test results are off, how would you know which is causing it or both? Check each separately.
You sent me the link for the sensor but I don't think I find the information on the sensor. I am most interested in the sensor.
Update, so far:
A shutter tester verifies the speed accuracy of the shutter (vs. the marked speed)...it cannot tell if the meter is telliing the shutter the wrong speed to use when the camera has no display of the shutter speed commanded by the meter
There are two sensors specified for GitHub device. One for the shutter speed modules and one for the EV and EE tests (as discussed in this thread). I attached the PDF for each below.
The reason I laugh at the suggestion of the Kyoritsu is I tried many times to buy one but they are no longer made. The ones for sale are broken. The working ones are not for sale. One would need to find a repair person going out of business and buy his or her stuff.
Here is Sover Wong's...I don't think he will be selling it to me
I agree in principle, but the nice thing about EV is that shutter speed and aperture can be combined into one single value which illuminates the issue of having to deal with two variables.
But if the film results are off due to both shutter/aperture and meter errors, how would you know which is causing the errors and how much?
Indeed, 'bad exposure can be
...which on can be determined primary by calibrated test instrumentation that can demonstrate the point of failure, which most of us do not have access to.
- shutter speed inaccuracy
- aperture close inaccuracy
- light meter inaccuracy
We can test against a 'known good' control unit, but the old saw recognizes, "Compare two devices and you are uncertain which one is right'
Great that there is a shutter speed indicator. Find yourself an area which is relatively featureless, and which can be illuminated uniformly by a light source...aim the cameras at that area. Set all meters to same ISO, and see if they all give 'same exposure' (equivalent combinations of shutterspeed + aperture)
Indeed, 'bad exposure can be
...which on can be determined primary by calibrated test instrumentation that can demonstrate the point of failure, which most of us do not have access to.
- shutter speed inaccuracy
- aperture close inaccuracy
- light meter inaccuracy
We can test against a 'known good' control unit, but the old saw recognizes, "Compare two devices and you are uncertain which one is right'
All good reasons to establish a personal E.I. and optimal development time. Most exposure errors result from user error. Some photographers blame their equipment for user error. It's just easier that way, and provides an opportunity to buy a new camera.
The EI would mean more if the camera and light meters are calibrated, otherwise it is an random number grabbed out of the ether.
The old saw:
"Give a man a watch and he'll always know the time. Give a man two watches and he'll never know the time."
You may wish to reconsider your response.
No. Uncalibrated equipment is naturally inaccurate.
… I have quite a backlog and a number of people asking me for pictures.
Can I have a picture?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?