Are they the same thing?
I wanted to look up the photo developer one, "hydroquinine" (toxicity, etc.), but somehow a search led me to "hydroquinone".
The forum here seems to refer to the __quinine version.
Wikipedia has the ___quinone as "a major component in most black and white photographic developers for film and paper where, with the compound metol, it reduces silver halides to elemental silver."
Are we wrongly using "hydroquinine" instead of "hydroquinone"?
Hydroquinone is one example of a dihydroxybenzene, useful for development (disassociation of silver halides into elemental silver). And I think you are correct, it should be referred to as hydroquinone, generally.
One will ameliorate your malaria, the other will develop your film. Do not interchange; hydroquinone is toxic and hydroquinine isn't superadditive with metol or phenidone.
An aside: funny that this page is from "Millipore Sigma", I guess a small specialized segment of my former employer, Millipore, now dissolved through acquisitions. Merck must have grabbed some useful life science bits? Working with science folks was the best, even at my very low level. Money wasn't bad either.
Virtually always. Just for another photographic example -- cyanotype made with ferrOcyanide is the exact opposite of the more common variety with ferrIcyanide. The latter gives a negative image, dark when light hits it -- the former a direct positive, dark when it doesn't get light.
There are some chemical names that differ slightly depending on location.
Aluminium/aluminum comes to mind.
And of course most substances have different names in different languages.