A large percentage of small businesses can't afford to commission photography or pay substantial amounts to license it. They are limited to photography that is free of royalty cost or, more and more, AI generated imagery.
That being said, even in this time of near revolutionary disruption to photographic markets, their is no excuse for not doing the right thing with photographic images that, at least until recently, had commercial value.
The existence the internet should not legitimize theft.
The company that took it was a large photography production service so they should have known better.
I don’t see how anyone can make ‘an innocent mistake’ when taking an image they find online and using it in a commercial context.
Hmmm, don’t you also get shady people knocking on your front door selling stuff?
why not give them the benefit of the doubt?
The company that took it was a large photography production service so they should have known better.
See my lengthy post and do some reading on the parties involved.
Yeah, but on the other hand this is Switzerland we are talking about. Somewhat rule-bound. Ask for a payment and hint (to the CEO) that you could ask the ISP to close down the website on grounds of plagiarism.
Koraks, great job in parsing out that tangled three-way mess. I could barely figure out who was who, doing what. So yesterday, this Michelle person said she would have it removed ASAP, then said it was removed, yet it is still there. (https://www.gosee.news/montrealphotoproducer/page/blog/item/31898 -- fifth photo down.)It's even more diffuse/opaque, which I think is a major part of the problem.
Your photo appeared on the gosee.news website, but inside one of the 'blogs' that's featured on the platform. It appears that pretty much anyone can create one of those blogs/portfolios by registering an account on gosee.news and then start uploading content. In this sense, gosee.news, the entity that's registered in Switzerland, is only the provider of the platform. The actual content creator (or the entity supposed to create content) is a third party that registers an account with them. I guess this doesn't change much w.r.t. the legal liability of the hosting provider (i.e. gosee.news) - it's still their website and their responsibility to ensure that the content that they host is legally kosher. However, they weren't the ones who stole your photo and appropriated it - even though, again, they're liable.
It appears that the actual 'blogger' that stole your photo is either a registered user or even a (former) employee or freelancer working for gosee.news - but I suspect the former. Their profile is here: https://www.gosee.expert/expert/experts-profile/NjE5OQ== The name leads to this LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drphotographyproducer/ If you look at this, it becomes clear that this is (pardon my French) some hopeless nitwit puffed up with hot air trying to make a buck out of basically leeching off other people's work while sitting under a palm tree in a sunny country. Platforms like gosee.news that basically don't give a hoot about what happens, as long as there's loads of traffic being generated without too much police showing up at 'their' P.O. Box 'head office' (note how the only employee findable on LinkedIn is a freelancer), will happily accommodate such good-for-nothing content thieves on the premise that it brings in the punters and the odds of getting busted for anything are pretty minimal. Ultimately, it appears that the responsibility for actually stealing your photo was with the 'Michelle d'Eze' character, whose website can be found here: http://www.beauchemindeze.com/ The ethically-unbothered gents at gosee.news are facilitators to the whole manure pile.
Make of this what you will. This is essentially the internet at its worst and frankly, it's beyond me how people like this d'Eze woman would want to profile themselves this way online for everyone to see. Nothing she shows makes her stand out as someone you'd want to professionally engage with - how credible is someone operating from the Dominican Republic as a location scout for Quebec? It's akin like putting on your business card "work with me, I'll mess up anything you ask and steal your stuff in the process". What a dumbass.
The 'apology' you received should apparently indicate best intentions and an honest mistake, but given what a bit of clicking around easily reveals (see above), it's plain to see no best intentions are present, here, and this is basically just a bunch of people deliberately trying to leech other people's work and actually working hard to avoid having to do some actual, honest work themselves.
Generally, I'm pretty nuanced in my views, but in a case like this, I'd have no qualms if someone would take a party like this to the f*ing cleaners.
The name leads to this LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drphotographyproducer/ If you look at this, it becomes clear that this is (pardon my French) some hopeless nitwit puffed up with hot air trying to make a buck out of basically leeching off other people's work while sitting under a palm tree in a sunny country.
This could happen if someone stole the image and sold it to the end user. It is very unlikely that this was the case but why not give them the benefit of the doubt?
That is quite the coincidence, Alex. I'd be interested in what you find out.I'll ask around. I have five LinkedIn contacts in common with her, one a colleague at work and the other a close friend.
That is quite the coincidence, Alex. I'd be interested in what you find out.
I'll ask around. I have five LinkedIn contacts in common with her, one a colleague at work and the other a close friend.
The use of photos to promote your business is a justifiable expense, "Generic photos from the web"? Someone took those photos and the use of them without permission and compensation is theft. Photgraphers are small businesses too. Don't take anything for granted. How would you like it if someone stole from you?
If someone used one of my pictures I would do as I described earlier, but Iv been self employed most of my working life and am used to making business deals.
Maybe I misunderstood. You wrote you sometimes take and use images from the internet for your small business without paying. But you would pursue anyone who did the same to you? What kind of business are you in?
Thanks; that would be interesting. I wonder if any of your mutual contacts has ever actually met or spoken to this person.I'll ask around. I have five LinkedIn contacts in common with her, one a colleague at work and the other a close friend.
The whole internet is a den of thieves. I get 2-3 emails daily, obviously spam from crooks trying to get private info so they can steal something from me. Then I get about 2-3 cell phone calls from people trying to sell me crap. When I search for something on the web, for weeks later I get ads on Youtube and elsewhere related to my inquiry. I often get ads for blue pills. No, I haven't asked.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?