400 speed film is too fast in bright sunlight if you only have 1/250 shutter speed. Frankly, Ektar 100 negative color film is great for landscape. At 100 ASA probably just right for your camera. Also consider using a tripod. If you want to use a slide type positive film, Velvia 100 is exciting but not for people. For skin tones if shooting people, I'd go with Portra 160. For indoors. I'd consider getting a flash. Good luck.
Why not Lomo 400 for a Lomo camera?
This photograph was captured with Lomo Color 100 roll film (though I used a Rolleiflex) :
Of course you're right, Alan - regarding the fact we've a Russian Lomo camera here, sharpness and an exact colors is not the very first goal a Lomo / Lubitel user.
When I had a a 166 Lubitel I noticed no difference between 125/sec or 1/250/sec ... Anyway, shooting those cameras is fun !
And yes, buying a roll of Portra 160 or Ektar 100 is not a bad idea, one can use the nice softness of the triplet lens wide open.
I'm still not sure which one would be ideal.
Unfortunately B&H only sells 5 packs of 120 film, so I'll have to choose which 5 pack to buy of portra. Can't get it locally here in Hawaii.
So, what do you recommend, 5 pack of Portra 160 or 5 pack of Portra 400? I'm still not sure which one would be ideal.
As Desi would say to Lucy: "22 posts about Fuji and Portra and you end up coming home with Ektar!Alright, I ended up ordering a 5 pack of Ektar 100, hope I don't regret it. After looking at some pictures, I really liked the look of Ektar with the really fine grain and the colors. Hope the pictures turn out well (never used ektar before).
I also ordered some Ilford XP2 400 (B&W Cross process).
So much for portra! Ever so fickle!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?