Short Exposures With Ilford Classic Fiber

Richard Jepsen

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
I’m trying to achieve an enlarging time of 10s or longer at a middle aperture on my 50mm Componon-S. Yesterday I was enlarging 5x7s with an aperture of f/11.5 timed 8.5s. LPL 670 condenser. Developer Ilford Multigrade mixed 1:14. Film -135 TMY-2. Completed prints had 5-6 stops of tones.

My thought is a slower developer would let me use f/8 and a time a bit above 10s. I tried a 105 enlarging lens but that seems impractical. Any suggestions?
 

MARTIE

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
271
Format
Multi Format
You could try using a lamp with a lower wattage?
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,248
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
OP
OP

Richard Jepsen

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
Nicholas
Should have thought of that. I have a Valoy with the same problem when using Classic. I have a project I’m using Classic on and don’t want to switch to another paper.
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
No matter the developer. Developing to completion is the same end result.

use a 75w bulb.

use a neutral density filter

use a longer lens

...
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,411
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
MARTIE said:
You could try using a lamp with a lower wattage?
Click to expand...

My enlarger has a high brightness and an lower brightness level.
 

Rick A

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
9,950
Location
Laurel Highlands
Format
8x10 Format
The obvious solution is to shoot denser negatives. In the old days, we picked our favorite graded paper and learned to expose negatives that printed the way we wanted.
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,606
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
NB23 said:
use a longer lens
Click to expand...
Except for possible idiosyncrasies with condenser settings and such, I believe the math says projecting the same negative to the same dimensions on a given enlarger is pretty much the same exposure regardless of lens focal length.

I managed to have three enlarging lenses for use with 35mm, 6x6 & 6x9 that happily all take the same filter thread. So I keep a 2-stop ND filter handy. I have used it to advantage with 6x6 (my main format) by putting the filter on to play around with small prints (5x5) for testing, then when I decide to go for 10x10 or so, taking the filter off puts me in the ballpark.
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm

I’m sure there are 2 seconds to be gained, with the lightbulb being 2x further away thabks to the longer lens. This calls for a test I will do asap.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,323
Format
4x5 Format
Rick A said:
The obvious solution is to shoot denser negatives. In the old days, we picked our favorite graded paper and learned to expose negatives that printed the way we wanted.
Click to expand...
It’s an option. I enjoyed some dense negatives this summer.

But my all-time classic move is to “drop” a Kodak Wratten No. 96 0.60 neutral density filter on top of the enlarging lens. I don’t have to touch it - it stays there all the time.

Two stops is perfect, it is still easy to focus and slows down print times just like you want. Sometimes I wish I had three stop 0.90 but then I realize three stops is too dark to see through easily.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,182
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
NB23 said:
I’m sure there are 2 seconds to be gained, with the lightbulb being 2x further away thabks to the longer lens. This calls for a test I will do asap.
Click to expand...
Nope - the light intensity is a function of magnification - negative to print. The cone of light from the longer lens is less spread out, so if it is the same distance away from the paper, the image at the paper is smaller and brighter. When you raise the head up, the image gets larger, but the intensity goes down. When the head is at the right height to achieve the same size print, the light intensity ends up being the same as well.
 
OP
OP

Richard Jepsen

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
Using an aperture of 11.5 places me .5 stops from f/16.

A rule of thumb is best optical performance is 2-3 stops from wide open. But hey, the prints are 5x7s so f/11.5 should not degrade the print.

The negatives print full tones with a 2.5 or 3 filter. I have a standard process that produce easy to print negatives. The lamp is 75w.

Wish Classic was a bit slower. Has lots of nice attributes. The density filter is the answer.
 

Maris

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
1,576
Location
Noosa, Australia
Format
Multi Format
Here's a contrary view ,,, but not for everybody.
I've done thousands of 5x7s off mainly roll film negatives. The vast majority of enlarger exposures have been less than 10 seconds, sometimes 3, 4, or 5 seconds. Lens apertures down to f16 or even f22 don't seem to make much difference at this modest enlargement ratio.
Yes, at big enlargement ratios the use of small apertures will infest the image with sharpness losing diffraction. BUT for big enlargements exposure times are long anyway so why use small apertures?
Burning and dodging can be done accurately for short exposure times; just takes practice and the willingness to accept some failures in the beginning. Minimising darkroom time is nice if the prints are coming out good.
 

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,639
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
If your enlarger has a filter drawer. ND gels are inexpensive and available in many densities. A simple, cheap and effective way to extend exposure times. And I assume if your times are so short, the negative is thin or the light source is bright, so you should still be able to see clearly enough for dodging and burning with the ND in place.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,748
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Pieter12 said:
Not sure the OP has a color head or filters.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that dawned on me just now. I don't even know if you can still buy sets of acetate filter sets. I usually use a longer focal length lens in this circumstance, however then you need enough bellows extension.
If the enlarger has an ordinary medium Edison base a lower wattage bulb could be used. 211 enlarger bulbs IIRC are 75W, 212 150W, I think an ordinary 40W bulb would do.

My first 4x5 enlarger had a Resitrol dimmer on the lamp, I never used it.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,748
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Aha! If I found the right enlarger it takes a PH140 lamp, medium base 75W opal lamp. I would go to a hardware store and try a 40W bulb.
 

albada

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Escondido, C
Format
35mm RF
mshchem said:
Aha! If I found the right enlarger it takes a PH140 lamp, medium base 75W opal lamp. I would go to a hardware store and try a 40W bulb.
Click to expand...
LEDs took over, so one might not be able to buy a 40W bulb any more. According to other reports on Photrio, popular LED bulbs are hit-and-miss in enlargers: Some are ok, some not. I like the suggestions of an ND or polarizer.

Mark Overton
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,748
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
That's why some us whack jobs panic bought a case of 15 and 25 watt genuine GE bulbs before they were all gone .

For contact printers and safelights I never use.

So get a threaded 2 stop neutral density filter for that beautiful Schneider lens.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Great tip on the ND filters, I was wondering how to deal w/ the negs that need dodging and burning. Does a ND filter degrade the enlarged print image?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,182
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
momus said:
Great tip on the ND filters, I was wondering how to deal w/ the negs that need dodging and burning. Does a ND filter degrade the enlarged print image?
Click to expand...
Not if it is above the negative.
And usually not to a meaningful extent if below.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…