Shooting weddings or similar pressure situations with Hasselblad film backs

Memoriam.

A
Memoriam.

  • 2
  • 1
  • 19
Self Portrait

D
Self Portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 17
Momiji-Silhouette

A
Momiji-Silhouette

  • 0
  • 0
  • 24
Silhouette

Silhouette

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
first-church.jpg

D
first-church.jpg

  • 5
  • 2
  • 85

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,988
Messages
2,767,760
Members
99,521
Latest member
OM-MSR
Recent bookmarks
0

ted_smith

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
493
Location
uk
Format
Multi Format
Curious to know if anyone here shoots weddings using a 501CM with film backs?

I am loving my Hasselblad 501CM but am finding changing rolls every 12 shots to be a little tricky, especially when under pressure. I've not used it for a wedding or anything like that, yet, but if the opportunity arises, I intend to do so.

When I got married, back in 2002, the photographer used a Hasselblad (though I don't know what sort - I didn't know much about MF then) and seemed to have no problem taking the 250 shots we'd agreed in advance. He may well have had a stash of pre-loaded backs but for 250 he must have had 20 backs!! Surely not? Having looked up the cost of second hand backs, they're about £350-£450 each!

Ted
 

rhcgn

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
36
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Hi Ted,

I would assume he would have had 2-4 backs and an assistant to change rolls while he was shooting?

Hendrik
 
OP
OP
ted_smith

ted_smith

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
493
Location
uk
Format
Multi Format
No, he was on his own!
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
I have buddies that came from the days when MF cameras were the cameras of choice for Weddings, it is fun to here them talk of being sent out with two rolls of 120 and being told not to shoot it all, I'm not suggesting that.

Typically weddings are hurry up and wait affairs. Just load during the waits and have enough backs to get through each hurry up.

If you know basically what shots you really want in each hurry up and when they will be, you can plan for that plus a bit extra.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,953
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
He was most probably using 220 film in A24 backs.
 

Ed Bray

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
352
Location
Plymouth, UK
Format
Multi Format
I shot weddings on MF for years initially just using a Mamiya C330f before moving on to a Hasselblad 500CM. I usually shot 5x rolls of Fuji NSP160 (60 images) in the later periods I pretty much exclusively used 120 sized Fuji Reala.

There were no film backs for the Mamiya C330f and I learnt to change films pretty quickly. RH suit pocket for unused films and LH suit pocket for used. I opened each film from its box and foil packaging before I got to the wedding so all I had to do was undo the sealing strip and insert into camera.

When I got the Hasselblad, I was spoilt with having 2x A12 backs which made life a little easier but you could not always guarantee that they would not run out at an inopportune moment.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
it is fun to here them talk of being sent out with two rolls of 120 and being told not to shoot it all

For my father's first wedding sent out on his own, he was given ten glass plates and told not to waste any.

Is it possible that your wedding photographer also used 35mm, just using the Hasselblad for the posed shots which he thought would be ordered in larger sizes?


Steve.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
For my father's first wedding sent out on his own, he was given ten glass plates and told not to waste any.

Is it possible that your wedding photographer also used 35mm, just using the Hasselblad for the posed shots which he thought would be ordered in larger sizes?

Steve.

Jose Villa mixes MF and 35mm as you suggest Steve, I think that is a great way of working.

The other thing he does that I think is really smart is that when he sees something happen that he thinks is important, but he can't quite get the shot he wants as it happens, he'll ask for a re-do.

I'm not saying he stops the ceremony to get a shot, just that the photographer's job is to get the shots the couple wants. The PJ mentality in style today has forgotten that to a large extent.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,953
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
I shot weddings on MF for years initially just using a Mamiya C330f before moving on to a Hasselblad 500CM. I usually shot 5x rolls of Fuji NSP160 (60 images) in the later periods I pretty much exclusively used 120 sized Fuji Reala.

There were no film backs for the Mamiya C330f and I learnt to change films pretty quickly. RH suit pocket for unused films and LH suit pocket for used. I opened each film from its box and foil packaging before I got to the wedding so all I had to do was undo the sealing strip and insert into camera.

When I got the Hasselblad, I was spoilt with having 2x A12 backs which made life a little easier but you could not always guarantee that they would not run out at an inopportune moment.
I used to shoot weddings with a pair of Mamiya C330f's and used Kodak Vericolor 220 film I preloaded the cameras before going to the gig which gave me 48 shots before needing to change films which was plenty for the actual wedding as well as giving me a back up camera in case of mechanical failure, and I could change the films in the time allowed after the wedding and before the reception.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,953
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Curious to know if anyone here shoots weddings using a 501CM with film backs?

I am loving my Hasselblad 501CM but am finding changing rolls every 12 shots to be a little tricky, especially when under pressure. I've not used it for a wedding or anything like that, yet, but if the opportunity arises, I intend to do so.

When I got married, back in 2002, the photographer used a Hasselblad (though I don't know what sort - I didn't know much about MF then) and seemed to have no problem taking the 250 shots we'd agreed in advance. He may well have had a stash of pre-loaded backs but for 250 he must have had 20 backs!! Surely not? Having looked up the cost of second hand backs, they're about £350-£450 each!

Ted
Ted, where are you getting the prices for your A12 backs from Harvey Nichols :D, look at Ffords you can get an Ex ++ one for £99 and a Ex+ one for £79 with their six months warranty. http://www.ffordes.co.uk/category/Medium_Format/Hasselblad/Hasselblad_V_Series/Film_Magazines
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
ted_smith

ted_smith

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
493
Location
uk
Format
Multi Format
Ted, where are you getting the prices for your A12 backs from Harvey Nichols :D, look at Ffords you can get an Ex ++ one for £99 and a Ex+ one for £79 with their six months warranty. http://www.ffordes.co.uk/category/Medium_Format/Hasselblad/Hasselblad_V_Series/Film_Magazines

lol....oh yeah!! I was looking at eBay...I always forget about ffordes. Excellent...I will remember that for when I get round to buying some extra backs.

These replies are al very interesting. As for my photographer when I got married - no, it was all MF. I actually got the negatives recently because the franchise he worked for went bust. I now have 250 MF negs of Kodak Portra 160 or similar, I think it is. So there was no 35mm going on with him. As someone said above, maybe he had backs that loaded more film into them.
 

Dashcraft

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
1
Format
Large Format
I worked weddings for 28 yrs w/2 bodies and 3 A12 backs. There is almost always time to reload and if not everybody understands when you have to stop to do so. The trick is to reload a back whenever the time allows, don't wait for all the backs to be reloaded at once if you can.

David
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,953
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
lol....oh yeah!! I was looking at eBay...I always forget about ffordes. Excellent...I will remember that for when I get round to buying some extra backs.

These replies are al very interesting. As for my photographer when I got married - no, it was all MF. I actually got the negatives recently because the franchise he worked for went bust. I now have 250 MF negs of Kodak Portra 160 or similar, I think it is. So there was no 35mm going on with him. As someone said above, maybe he had backs that loaded more film into them.
Many e bay sellers are just after a fast buck, you're much better buying from a reputable retailer who give a warranty and I recommend Ffords I've bought several items from them recently, and they have all been excellent.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,284
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Most of my weddings were shot with a single C330. I carried 35mm equipment for emergency backup, but never had to use it.

I used to mix 220 and 120.

Every once in a while I'd have to waste a shot or two (e.g. to ensure a fresh roll for the newlyweds' walk down the aisle) but generally it was enough to understand the timing of things and working within that.

You get quite good at unloading/loading film :smile:.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
22
Location
Miami
Format
35mm
I that this is great! I am just making the transition to film and using the opportunity at weddings. I have no shame in the redo. It is only selective as I am a PJ at heart. A mix of everything is good!
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,400
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
Typically weddings are hurry up and wait affairs. Just load during the waits and have enough backs to get through each hurry up.

If you know basically what shots you really want in each hurry up and when they will be, you can plan for that plus a bit extra.

^^^
I got along fine having 4 backs to instantly put on my ETRSi, and loading new rolls of film during the many 'waits'. Having 220 rather than 120 further eased things.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,953
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Ted 220 24 on 120 backs are cheap these days because of the limited availability of 220 film, but Kodak Portra is still available in that size and cost about £69 for a pack of 5 rolls which should be plenty to shoot a wedding with. Check this out http://www.ffordes.com/product/10072316352953
 

analoguey

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
1,103
Location
Bangalore, I
Format
Multi Format
Did you all only use one type of film? What ifu wanted to shoot bnw and colour?

sent from tap-a-talk
 

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,961
Format
Multi Format
I started out with four Mamiya C's (I had the whole lineup from original C to C330S. I can remember 12+ bodies at one point. Not multiple backs, multiple bodies). I would shoot 220 during the ceremony (400 and later 800 speed color neg) then switch to 120 during the reception. Later I switched to Hasselblad and it was three bodies, five 220 backs, and a number of 120 backs.

Now I shoot 120, 220, and 70mm in my blads. And I can also shoot single sheets :smile:
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,248
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I do not shoot weddings, however if I am going into a situation that will require that I change film and I will miss opportunities, I use multiple film backs.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
I remember assisting a photographer years ago for a magazine shoot. He shot with at least 3 backs and he shot his Hassy faster than I could load his 120 backs. They're not the easiest to load. I think what can reduce the pressure is always have one magazine loaded then reload the empty magazine during down times. It's like driving with a spare tire. 220 film will give you more shots, but it seems that it isn't made anymore. :sad:
 

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,961
Format
Multi Format

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,399
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Actually I have a big stock of 220 in my deep freeze.

I also have at least ten different kinds of 70mm B&W which I will use up over time. 70mm is still available fresh in a couple of flavors.

Proof of my 70mm film interest here (over at RFF)

https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=161383&highlight=70mm+fun
Does anyone still offer perforated black and white? I suppose that Kodak will still produce cine color negative film for Hollywood mogul types. I have a huge SS reel and Nikor tank so I'm ready to go :smile:. I always wanted a "Lunar" looking EL/M with a 70mm back.

As far as shooting weddings. No way!
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,608
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Curious to know if anyone here shoots weddings using a 501CM with film backs?

I am loving my Hasselblad 501CM but am finding changing rolls every 12 shots to be a little tricky, especially when under pressure. I've not used it for a wedding or anything like that, yet, but if the opportunity arises, I intend to do so.

When I got married, back in 2002, the photographer used a Hasselblad (though I don't know what sort - I didn't know much about MF then) and seemed to have no problem taking the 250 shots we'd agreed in advance. He may well have had a stash of pre-loaded backs but for 250 he must have had 20 backs!! Surely not? Having looked up the cost of second hand backs, they're about £350-£450 each!

Ted
with a bit of practice, changing film in a Hasselblad back takes only a few seconds but if you get paid well, you should have enough in the budget for an assistant!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom