If you bounce flash off any surface that isn't white, you will get a colour cast the same colour as the surface of the bounce.
Depending on the barns interior roof this will effect the photos colour.
You can use a flash that carries its own bounce surface like this one https://www.oddcameras.com/braun_370_bvc.htm and there are others...
What's wrong about that?Reverse order: Solved it with a motor drive and a digital counter.
I don't agree. I have had several of these and I still use a III quite regularly. Never ever a problem. And yes, I have a working spare in case of...And no, Pearl has big problems with spacing of frames, and broken mechanisms.
That's a preposterous claim IMO. 100 years and 1000s of serious professional photographers used 6x9 cameras with beautiful results. They were all wrong according to your claim....Any 6x9 folder has problems with flatness. Even the last ones released.
But good nevertheless. And in principle: they fold...Plaubel uses a scissor strut erector. Completely different from a folder, with it own advantages and disadvantages.
The OP decided to use a point and shoot, not a Holga...A bit of overkill for a Holga.....
The OP decided to use a point and shoot, not a Holga...
Yes, and it looks ridiculous, I have to admit. But I use it nevertheless, even with a flash trigger in case that there is no hot shoe or PC connector. And there are smaller units with the same head that go into a hot shoe.Wouldn't you say that using a flash from your link with a point & shoot (even if it was possible) would be an overkill too?
The OP decided to use a point and shoot, not a Holga...
Wouldn't you say that using a flash from your link with a point & shoot (even if it was possible) would be an overkill too?
What's wrong about that?
I don't agree. I have had several of these and I still use a III quite regularly. Never ever a problem. And yes, I have a working spare in case of...
That's a preposterous claim IMO. 100 years and 1000s of serious professional photographers used 6x9 cameras with beautiful results. They were all wrong according to your claim....
But good nevertheless. And in principle: they fold...
Definitely!
I mean, OP is trying to snap a few casual shots as a guest at a wedding. Why on earth wouldn't you want to go out and buy a new camera, flash, hire a couple of assistants...?!
Programmers who built this site need to go back to the drawing board because obviously Photrio's CI (for "Collective Intelligence") has yet to learn how to answer the question "How can I keep it simple?" by anything other than "Make it as complicated as you can."
This thread started with a Holga, and now I'm waiting for someone to come in and suggest a setup that even Gregory Crewdson would find excessive.
(Just kidding, guys, rainy day here, not much to do, keep going, keep going...)
Programmers who built this site need to go back to the drawing board because obviously Photrio's CI (for "Collective Intelligence") has yet to learn how to answer the question "How can I keep it simple?" by anything other than "Make it as complicated as you can."
This thread started with a Holga, and now I'm waiting for someone to come in and suggest a setup that even Gregory Crewdson would find excessive.
(Just kidding, guys, rainy day here, not much to do, keep going, keep going...)
From my own experience, steel yourself for the wedding couple and their relatives being underwhelmed with your photos because they are rather grainy and not in colour.
I went down this route with Delta 3200, determined to use what little light there was in the venue. I knew there would be many digital cameras and phones there to get colour shots using flash, and like you I wanted to do something different. I had previously gotten very nice results with Delta 3200 at box speed in Emofin, so I gave every shot 1/30 at f/2 and developed as before.
All my shots were under-exposed, I disliked them all anyway, and the couple made no comment when they received them. This below was arguably the best of the bunch, and only because the cake was rock hard!
View attachment 339555
Do you think this could work in the barn?
Interesting thread that has surfaced again. I want to mention that I consider this photo close to a masterpiece and if the bride and groom don't appreciate it, you, @ snusmumriken, need to swap them out for friends or relatives with a sense of humour and aesthetics. It's like something from a play. Even the bystanders are perfect.
Interesting thread that has surfaced again. I want to mention that I consider this photo close to a masterpiece and if the bride and groom don't appreciate it, you, @ snusmumriken, need to swap them out for friends or relatives with a sense of humour and aesthetics. It's like something from a play. Even the bystanders are perfect.
Thank you both so much, that is immensely cheering! The thing is, though, that we are on this thread because we already love b/w imagery, and film/paper as a beautiful medium. I’m sure you are familiar with the kind of people who indulge you by looking at your photos and then say only, “It’s a pity you can’t do colour”. That’s what the OP would have been up against with his plan. It would be nice to hear how it went, @-persimmon-tree- ?I agree 100% with these sentiments A great shot and in keeping with the tradition of making boxing films in b&w where it captures the action and ambience better, b&w does exactly the same for weddings
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?