Hi..I'm Ganesh from Bangalore, India.
I'm an active medium format photographer and got my LF Chamonix recently...excited to explore large format process.
Need advice on LF lens for my portraiture and fine art work.
Been looking at 210 focal length in eBay, any other recommended portal?
Assuming you're talking about 4x5...yes, 210mm is a nice focal length for portraits. Actually, 150mm is also nice.
My preferences for 210mm lenses are ... (in no particular order)
With any of these prefer one in a late model copal shutter - the ones with the black shutter speed dial and the ones just prior to that with the chrome shutter speed dial that looks the same as the black dial...avoid the early copal shutters with the "fine toothed" or "serrated edge" shutter speed dial.
- Rodenstock Sironar-N - avoid plain Sironar (ie, without an "S" or "N")
- Schneider Symmar-S or APO Symmar
- Nikon Nikkor-W
- Schneider Xenar
- Rodenstock Geronar (this one is especially good for portraits! and often dismissed becuase of its simple design)
- the newer Fujinon-W and CM-W are also fine choices.
....the Crème de la crème is my 1863 8" f4 Taylor, Taylor, & Hobson. Rapid Acting Petzval. I have front mounting shutters that fit it, one a Gitzo with flash sync.
Ian
Everyone else seems to prefer a 210mm for portraits -- except you and me. I think a 250mm -- or 300mm -- is better.
Most LF field cameras only have double extension, that means maximum bellows draw is twice the nominal standard FL lens, which is 150mm/6" with a 5x4 camera, so a 300mm lens is at almost full bellows extension focussed at Infinity. With my Wista 45DX or Super Graphic a 300mm lens is very impractical. I do have 3 5x4 cameras, all MPPs with triple extension, but reality is I like working with short FL lenses.
Ian
As others have mentioned, any particular reasons why you are looking for a sharp portrait lens?
Not liking that soft looks in portraiture
Not liking that soft looks in portraiture
Speaking of Cooke, I recall a modern Cooke lens that was specifically marketed as a 4x5 portrait lens...
the Cooke PS945 or something like that wasn't it? I remember that it was priced well outside my comfort zone....and so never paid it much attention.
A late 1960's coated Heliar in a shutter is a force to reckon with.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?