rhmimac Member Allowing Ads Joined Mar 2, 2008 Messages 284 Location Antwerp Format 35mm Jun 29, 2010 #1 I don't seem to find any data on developing SFX 200 shot @ EI 100 in DDX or ilfosol 3. Which of both dev's will suit this exposure best? No filter used, just used it as a plain B&W film. Could anyone give me a hint? Thanks? rhmimac
I don't seem to find any data on developing SFX 200 shot @ EI 100 in DDX or ilfosol 3. Which of both dev's will suit this exposure best? No filter used, just used it as a plain B&W film. Could anyone give me a hint? Thanks? rhmimac
monodave Member Allowing Ads Joined Dec 3, 2007 Messages 53 Location Peak Distric Format Medium Format Jun 29, 2010 #2 I use same dev times as FP4. Works fine for me. I expose for IR but can't see why same logic wouldn't work using it as downrated normal film. Dave
I use same dev times as FP4. Works fine for me. I expose for IR but can't see why same logic wouldn't work using it as downrated normal film. Dave
OP OP rhmimac Member Allowing Ads Joined Mar 2, 2008 Messages 284 Location Antwerp Format 35mm Jun 30, 2010 #3 Thanks Dave, I get 4 min's for 1+9 ilfosol3 100ASA and 7 min's for 1+14 at 20°C rhmimac
monodave Member Allowing Ads Joined Dec 3, 2007 Messages 53 Location Peak Distric Format Medium Format Jun 30, 2010 #4 That's great. I thought it should work. Personally, I would avoid the 1+14 dilution unless you want grain like golf balls. It will be quite an extreme effect with SFX! Dave
That's great. I thought it should work. Personally, I would avoid the 1+14 dilution unless you want grain like golf balls. It will be quite an extreme effect with SFX! Dave
FRANOL Member Allowing Ads Joined Jul 2, 2007 Messages 50 Format 35mm Aug 28, 2010 #5 SFX 200 in Ilford ID11 stock, (10 min, agit.20-30 sec. in start).Just great results