• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Self Employed


jtk is such an acolyte of digital, often claiming some imaginary "superiority", that he fails to realize that the most important aspect of creating compelling images is in the creator's passion for the process. The joy of creating the image is what drives us all, whether digital or traditional. Rather than embrace that reality, he'd rather toss about smug, useless comments. I'd like to see his personal work which backs up his claims of superiority.
 
I happen to like analog images more, mostly for the visual depth and character that the small imperfections bring. To my eye, digital is flat. That said, I cannot imagine doing commercial work on film, the time constraints and the margin for error far outweigh any artistic considerations. There seems to be a time and place for both and there's really no need to value one more than the other.
 
i see what you are saying, and he did post some of his images, but to be honest its all just opinion. he also suggests that people who struggle in a extremely tight market are lazy, and that one can just stroll in off the street to ad agencies, publicists, architecture firms without appointments and just demand to see creative directors &c. and that dye transfer printing was done by every mom and pop portrait studio across america (and the process wasn't complicated or time consuming) but ... people who have done hustled photography in the last 20-30 years, know what he says might not be true everywhere. maybe in a small town where everyone knows eachother, and a small town where the local photographer DID dye transfers on a regular basis &c .. who knows .. cause it doesnt' matter. like everything on the internet its just opinion from random people who may or may not be who they claim they are.
couldn't agree with you more eddie, sure digital is great, sure film is great .. but these things don't matter if the person shooting don't care. and the markets they are working are over crowded with the old boy / old girl network where people only hire their pals from school &c, or the system is corrupt in other ways, none of these things matter cause you could be the best there is, but if no one hires you, you'll still be eating potatoes every night for dinner.

as with everything YMMV
 

You failed to read the OT. Bitterness hinders joys.

The key OT concept is "self-employed"...employment = income. "Joy" in self-employment entails success.

I found it easy to create a good (joyful) studio photo business because I was inspired (Minor White friends) and wasn't lazy.
 

Mr Jnanian/nantz, Using two names you've obsessively tracked my posts for several years, misrepresenting them. "Who knows" and "it doesn't matter" are weak alibis, nothing more. Zen attitude may seem similar but isn't alibi...and it involves truth.
 
Thank you for this. Sincerely.
 
... you've obsessively tracked my posts for several years, misrepresenting them. "Who knows" and "it doesn't matter" are weak alibis, nothing more. Zen attitude may seem similar but isn't alibi...and it involves truth.
Click to expand...
naah haven't obsessively tracked or misrepresented anything, and i don't practice zen.
i don't claim to know more than i do, so, who knows and it really doesn't matter and Your Mileage May Vary ( YMMV ) .. seem more fitting.
cause i don't know, and more than likely none of it really matters.
keep posting thought provoking stuff, its more interesting than whether rodinal is the best developer EVER or if one needs to use stop bath
happy photographing in 2020!
 
Last edited:

Happiness to you too! I've started the year off with a couple of 70s/80s Kodachrome projects to digitize with the 30mp rig I built in December ...waiting for one more piece tomorrow to perfect. After that tech marathon i need to work up the gumption (old man term) to do something journalistic...which would be new thang for me.
 

This makes sense. Even people with limited visual vocabulary can spot a shaky or amateurish video, but it's harder for them to spot an amateurish still image.
 
< looking for the like button ! >
excellent !
its never easy to leave our comfort zone and push our limits ( both tech wise and making photographs wise )!
not sure if it is a NYR ( new year resolution) but its a great one
 
Last edited:
The piece I needed arrived last week, a unique Omega neg carrier, enabling me to digitize about 500 old Kodachromes using a 30mp Samsung/Pentax-macro. rig. Nearly as high resolution as Nikonscan of several same slides, but if course don't suffer Nikonscan/Kodachromes color problem. Big fun! Nice enough to make me miss Kodachrome. I did a lot of that cc1970 using Sickles/Zeiss camera and EKs excellent E4 dupe film. Time flies...important to have fun and avoid cynics.
 
Any hobby is fun with added bonus of not having to do it when other things in life take priorities. Once that hobby becomes basis of making a living, it changes everything, eventually (or instantly) turning into an unnecessary necessity.

It is one thing to have a job one likes, another to have life dependent on what once was plain fun. Never mind the untethered creativity of a hobby strangled by "creativity" needed to please commerce.
 

Somehow I doubt people like Capa and Penn...and Ansel Adams and Frank for that matter, felt their "creativity was stifled" by photographing for their incomes. I've heard that line occasionally from envious people, however.
 
MattKing said:
Cheryl is great, and I know at least one other "Mom with Camera" who is also great.
Click to expand...
lady down the road from me is absolutely fantastic, i just wish she'd ask 10x more for the CD when she delivers her work !
 

I love videos like that. Thanks for posting.
 

I'm contacted a fair amount for photographs I've taken, however, it's usually because they want to use it for free and are asking permission before just taking it. I do a fair amount of stock and urban photography. You'd be amazed at how often you'd be contacted because somebody wants to use a picture of a business you took for some editorial piece that they're writing. Usually they're just trying to find out if you're going to be OK with them using it with a credit and nothing else, or if you're going to demand payment for use, though often times, especially for product photography, they'll just take it and not say anything. For example, a lot of product photos for various films available for sale on Amazon were actually taken by me, but they've been re-used and recycled for new listings on different platforms by other sellers so often that I can't even keep track, and going after them and demanding payment isn't worth the money I'd get back, so in that case, I consider it to be a public service. It's actually kind of jarring to be browsing along and seeing one of your own product photos pop up in a google ad, or pop up in some online listing.

I've cut down how many product photos I take as a result simply because it's time and effort that I'm never really going to get paid for. If I'm commissioned to do some product photos that's one thing, but that market has been shrinking for a long time with the advent of "Joe, the young guy in the mailroom with a nice camera" who can take them (sort of) for the company.

The same goes for wedding photography. There's still a market for high end stuff, but middle and budget tiers have been getting eaten alive with "we'll just have all our friends take photos with their cell phones instead of pay you". Especially with the younger crowd. The older crowd still wants official photos, but younger ones, not so much. More correctly, they do, but don't want to pay what it really costs to do it at a professional level.
 
jtk said:
Somehow I doubt people like Capa and Penn...and Ansel Adams and Frank for that matter, felt their "creativity was stifled" by photographing for their incomes. I've heard that line occasionally from envious people, however.
Click to expand...
How do you know I envy any one of them? Got some evidence besides cheap arrogance of your own? You are accusing me of that so you have to have a proof no? Or is this just a platform for personal attacks now?

If you don"t have any, I suggest you retrackt it. Have a great day.
 

Your name wasn't mentioned. If you have something to say that others might find reasonable, say it.
 
 

That's the way it is in New Mexico and, probably everywhere else. Winners earn their success...losers complain.

Long, long ago when I started pro work a couple of successes told me, in no uncertain terms, to charge twice what struggling losers charge. So I charged 3x, which was still a lot less than the best charged. If you're cheap, you're cheap and probably NFG. Clients aren't stupid or evil ...and if you disagree you should find some other line of work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register