sekor k/l 127 vs z 110 vs z 90. highest resolution?

[chris77]

hello all.

title says it already. as i am doing big prints with a g-componon i am considering resolution as prime priority for a choice of a "normal" length.

which one to choose?

 

[tedr1]

In each case the image scale is different due to the different focal lengths, this effect may be greater than differences in lens resolving power.

 

[chris77]

well thats clear.. but thanks.
i dont mind the focal length. what i am asking myself, which of these lenses will produce more detail, given a perfectly alligned enlarger and lens capable of high magnification (2x)

 

[flavio81]

I would guess probably the 110 as it came later.

I am not sure if the 127 exists in KL version. The 127/3.8 was one of the first lenses for the system.

You should run a test.

 

[EdSawyer]

I vote for the 110 also. Great lens, even wide open. http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/MF_testing.html

 

[Stephen Prunier]

I have, an use, the RZ 110 and love it.

 

[Alan Gales]

I had an RZ with the 110. The first time that I used it I shot a group portrait of my wife with her son, his wife and new baby. My wife said never again. She hated that lens.

Sometimes lenses can be too sharp.

 

[chris77]

well, thanks everybody.
i will get the 90 and the 110 and compare them, then decide which one to keep.
chris

 

[Jeff L]

well, thanks everybody.
i will get the 90 and the 110 and compare them, then decide which one to keep.
chris

I have shot with the 110 and it was very sharp.
Report back and let us know how it turned out.
Good luck.