Wow - I did not expect to get all these responses to my musing. Thanks very much to all concerned, appreciated.
Small clarification; I had no intention of stoking the film/digital debate and am happy for both to coexist as forms of producing picures (trying to choose words carefully!). My standpoint is that if one mentions photography to someone, they tend to think of it as digitally produced as that is the default production method nowadays. Whilst I might hope that my pictures might stand up to scrutiny against a digital produced image, the fact that I have chosen to use film/print etc is, to my mind, something that is important with my work & how to reflect that choice in a succint non-pompous way.
Probably thinking about this waaay too much, but that's me all over!
Current thoughts:
Wet photography is liable (in some circles) to hint at something towards the porn market;
Film is probably more associated with movies now;
Analogue doesn't (yet) have enough of a known resonance outside of a small circle to be understood in regard to photography;
Hand prints could indicate prints of hands (eg baby hand prints with the poster paint!)
Classical leads one to think of Greek statues and portraits of Homer
Traditional might indicate pictures of old thatched cottages.....
Please, not denigrating anyones choice of "describer" - I have come up with nothing better, just trying to explore the outer reaches of my known vocabulary!!
Cheers for all the input
Sim2
*searching for a thesaurus*
I like to use the word 'darkroom.' I think it's a good way of differentiating analog photography from digital photography.
digital imagery is definitely NOT photography. The two may have a similar end product but they are not similar activities.
I make images with chemicals that change properties when light hits them. Digital 'photographers' make images by manipulating matrices of numbers. I have nothing against that, but if you get down to fundamentals there isn't really much relation between the two.
I don't know how anyone can say that digital photography is somehow not photography... that argument doesn't hold an ounce of water.
It is Digital Photograpy vs Photograpy of course. hen and egg, what came first. What was here for nearly 170 years before Jon Doe discovered there was something as unnatural as photograpy without film?
I carefully list my medium as "silver gelatin photograph,"
What's wrong with just photography?
The word has always implied a wet process.
I am a photographer, not a computer photographic generator.
I don't take crap photographs and let a computer be my salvation.
But if you want a descriptor, how about "Real Photography"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?