Some call a view camera as "cary everywhere" it's more than a stretch, but how we define that aspect is everyone's choice. The comments I made here before I did not pay attention to that part at all. But on a second thought, it'd be kinda interesting to know what OP meant by the "everywhere" part.
Could not agree more.We've certainly stretched the limit of the "carry anywhere" MF camera....with the Pentax 67 and RB67 and even Eli's Hasselblad kit. What exactly does 'going anywhere' mean? Just because you can carry it does it necessarily mean that you would? Certainly if photography was the specific goal you might.....but does it make it the best? If it spends most of the day on your car seat it might....but if you're carrying it all day long everywhere, it might quickly lose its charm....compared to a folder, new Mamiya 6MF or a naked Rolleiflex or 'cord.....
(photo Mamiya 6, 50mm)View attachment 334759
Could not agree more.
BTW, is this your shot? Love it.
I interpreted "carry everywhere" not to mean carrying the camera to every location you want photograph, since aside from Linhof 8x10s I assumed we all do that anyway--maybe I'm wrong.)
I interpreted it as a camera that is always with you, whether you're planning to photograph or not, you carry it everywhere, so if that unexpected shot appears, you are ready. The flips side of the "the best camera is the one you have with you" argument.
Thank you. Yes it is my photo. Here's another. Fuji GSW690 lll. Although i've owned both a P67 and an RB67 they would not have made these trips....View attachment 334760
Hasselblad 500C
View attachment 334679
from : https://mikeeckman.com/2021/12/hasselblad-500-c-1957/
Mamiya C220
View attachment 334681
from : https://www.pacificrimcamera.com/rl/01534/01534.pdf
Must have been one of these internet truths.
This said, if one wants light, compact and dependable: Rollei TLR. Give up lens interchangeability. Lose? Depends.
Welcome to Photrio!
In your post you mention fixed lens cameras, a rangefinder, SLRs, TLR, and folder. Have you tried most/all of the above styles? Usually people have a preference and that can help you decide.
Anyway if your main concern is easy carry and you would be happy with just one lens I’d stay away from cameras like Hasselblad which would be overkill. If you need a “system” camera Hasselblads are great but there are simpler, easier to carry options if you don’t need all the extras.
From your list the Rolleicord is looking pretty good to me and Yashicamats are a less expensive option but still with quality glass. But you have to like the TLR way of doing things of course.
Also if you’re going to be doing your own metering anyway you might consider avoiding electronics in the camera. One less thing to go wrong.
How is buying a Hasselblad overkill?
- Buy one camera that last for life
- Buy one camera with abundant parts and services
- Buy one camera that is a system with a wide range of lenses to choose from
- Buy one cameran and NOT have to repeated by one camera after another that works, is serviceable and has lenses available and working.
- Not having to carry around a TLR with a normal lens, a TLR with a wide lens and a TLR with a telephoto lens
How is buying a Hasselblad overkill?
That was my read as well. That's what makes MF folders such an attractive option.....
Older cameras (including pre-WW2) can be wonderful shooters if you know how to repair old cameras or purchase from someone who does, like @Alex Varas.
I think 6x6 has advantages vs 6x4.5 if you like the square format, you want to be able to project transparencies
think 6x6 has advantages vs 6x4.5 if you like the square format, you want to be able to project transparencies, or you wish to use a waist-level finder and avoid the inconvenience of rotating the camera when shooting vertical compositions. Otherwise, they are pretty much the same thing, IMO.
Larger formats: Have gotten very satisfying results from a Fuji GSW690 III - when I held the camera really steady! These big cameras were once a ubiquitous sight in Japan, where they were used to photograph groups of tourists at scenic locations. But the cameras were generally mounted atop a tripod. But for mixed shooting styles, where there might be some camera shake, I’d prefer the more economical 6x4.5 format
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?