Schneider symmar 150/265 lens.

Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 2
  • 2
  • 48
Spin-in-in-in

D
Spin-in-in-in

  • 0
  • 0
  • 32
Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 13
  • 8
  • 227
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 154

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,860
Messages
2,782,076
Members
99,733
Latest member
dlevans59
Recent bookmarks
0

Paul.

Member
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
306
Format
8x10 Format
I have today baught a Sinar Norma outfit with a Schneider symmar 150 / 265 lens. Can you tell me if my assumption that removeing the rear elements converts it from 150 to 265 is correct. I have never come across this type of lens before and would be interested to hear peoples oppinion of it.

Thanks.

Regards Paul.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
No, you remove the front cell to get a 265mm lens.

This leaves the shutter blades exposed, but unless the conditions are very crappy that's nothing to worry about.
 
OP
OP

Paul.

Member
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
306
Format
8x10 Format
Thank you Ole, that was my first mistake and I have only owned the camera 6 hours.

Regards Paul.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
6 hours and only one mistake - that's really good! :smile:

BTW the 150mm symmar is a pretty good 150mm lens; as a 265 it is prone to chromatic aberration in the corners of 4x5". It will be sharper than enlarging the central part of a 4x5" negative 1.77 times extra, but not as sharp as a negative shot with a "real" 265mm lens. The center of a negative shot with a converted Symmar is pretty good, so if you need to crop/enlarge even more it can be really useful.

In other words I will only recommend the converted lens if that's the only way to get the shot. Or if you want fuzzy corners.
 
OP
OP

Paul.

Member
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
306
Format
8x10 Format
Ah that was owned not used. Once again thanks Ole.

Regards Paul.
 

RoBBo

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
255
Location
Chicago, IL
Format
Multi Format
I've found that my 210/370 converts with either the front OR the back, though it seems a little sharper with the back on, I can actually use it on my 4x5 with the front on since it moves the nodal point further forward.
 

walter23

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
1,206
Location
Victoria BC
Format
4x5 Format
I also have a 150/265 (with some very slight fogging in it) and it performs well - helps me out with high contrast scenes, in fact :wink:

My multicoated rodenstock lenses are sharper, but I won't hesitate to use the 150 or 265 configurations of the symmar when I need those focal lengths.
 

Tomf2468

Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
82
Location
Simi Valley,
Format
Large Format
I haven't used this exact lens, but I do have a convertable (?14-19-26?) Wollensak that I still use on my 11x14. It was my first (and at that time only) 11x14 lens, so I used it in single cel mode often. What hasn't been mentioned is filters. If you are shooting B&W, then adding a yellow or orange filter to the single cel will significantly improve the apparent resolution. Great trick for B&W, looks "rather odd" with color film ;-)

Tom
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
(there was a url link here which no longer exists) was shot with a converted Symmar 150mm, and (there was a url link here which no longer exists) is an enlargement of the top right corner showing chromatic aberration (and quite a bit of astigmatism, too).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom