Schneider 80mm f4 vs. 5.6

Flow of thoughts

D
Flow of thoughts

  • 2
  • 0
  • 31
Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 3
  • 2
  • 39
Plague

D
Plague

  • 0
  • 0
  • 43
Vinsey

A
Vinsey

  • 3
  • 1
  • 69

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,155
Messages
2,787,192
Members
99,825
Latest member
TOWIN
Recent bookmarks
0

images39

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
516
Location
Reno, NV
Format
Medium Format
Is there a difference between the Schneider Componon S 80mm f4 compared to f5.6 (besides being one stop faster)? Is there any significant difference in construction or optical performance? I have the 80mm f4, but have an opportunity to buy a 5.6.

Thanks,
Dale
 

jjphoto

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
402
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Multi Format
Are you referring to the WA-Componon 5.6/80 or possibly an older componon from the 50's or 60's?

The WA-Componon 5.6/80 is also a 6 element 4 group lens, like the 4/80 Componon-S, but it is a wide angle lens with a larger image circle. I'm fairly sure the Componon-S is the technically 'better' lens but can't be certain.

There's technical info about them here: http://photocornucopia.com/1061.html
 

Ian C

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
1,258
Format
Large Format
The 80 mm f/5.6 version was a standard 6-element 4-group enlarging lens. I’ve not used one. I’d expect similar performance to other 6/4 lenses. It was replaced by the faster f/4 version.

There are 5 photos of the elusive 5.6/80 Componon-S in the following link:

https://picclick.com/Schneider-Kreu...larger-lens-in-183738938752.html#&gid=1&pid=1

One on eBay from Sweden, Schneider product code 13692 visible on the label on the product box:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Schneider-...nlarger-lens-Made-in-Germany-VGC/323914662932
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

images39

Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
516
Location
Reno, NV
Format
Medium Format
The 80/5.6 Componon S that I have must be a later version, as it has the aperture lever (it's not a WA-Componon). Interesting to hear that the 80/5.6 is elusive, I wasn't aware of that. I'm planning to buy the 80/4 version today, after which I will probably sell the 80/5.6. Still wondering if there's any difference in performance. My main reason for getting the faster version is that I use an LPL 4500 enlarger with VCCE head, which means that my exposures can be quite long. The faster lens will allow me to cut exposure times in half. I make enlargements with my current lens at f8, with the faster lens I'll use f5.6 (avoiding full aperture in both cases.

Dale
 

Huub

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
250
Format
4x5 Format
You could do some testing yourself if you have both lenses of course. What i would expect is that, even when one of the lenses might be slightly better in a general sense, the performance will depend as much on the individual sample. When you buy a pre-used lens, you never know how it was treated, even when it looks prestine. It might haven been dropped or it might have other issues that don't show when looking at it. Only some testing will tell you. The other reason is that even when these lenses were new, they showed small production tolerances. If i remember correctly, it was Ctein who concluded after careful testing that differences between various samples of the same lenses are sometimes bigger then the differences between lenses of various makers..
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
1
Format
Multi Format
Investigating this lens, FWIW, it appears that the 80mm f/5.6 Vivitar VME enlarging lens is identical to the Componon-S.
 

Attachments

  • 201103 Vivitar VME vs SchCompnoon 80 f56.png
    201103 Vivitar VME vs SchCompnoon 80 f56.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 224
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom