• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Saturation

Pitotshock

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 11, 2021
Messages
123
Location
Renfrew, ON, Canada
Format
Analog
Anyone else getting annoyed with the trend of super over saturated photos? I am seeing so many photos being spread around now that look like someone took a picture of the sunset or whatever and just cranked the vibrance and saturation and post it. Obviously, people like to look at photos like that as they are generally well received/liked/shared etc. Is it just me?
 
That is why I don't show my students hue/saturation in PS... or most things to do with colour. Most of the projects I assign have to be grayscaled. No bells and whistles in my class!
 
Andrew O'Neill said:
That is why I don't show my students hue/saturation in PS... or most things to do with colour. Most of the projects I assign have to be grayscaled. No bells and whistles in my class!
Click to expand...
A wise move! Garishness can cover many faults.
 
Pitotshock said:
Is it just me?
Click to expand...

No. I agree that the vast majority of photos you see have been grossly over processed to the point of cartoonish hyper reality. Most people simply don't know when to stop.
 
It is difficult to manage color, so a certain amount of "bad" color is to be expected, due to lack of skill. For those who do it on purpose, we can only hope that they will outgrow it. In the words of Bill Blake: "You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough." And also, "The fool who persists in his folly will become wise."

Actually, I am more annoyed by the opposite - the trend to shoot digital, and then desaturate to b&w for no good reason. Yes, there is some percentage of digital images which will work better in b&w. But there are many more images that gain nothing, and loose something, when desaturated. Maybe it's a good idea to teach students the basics of composition and lighting in monochrome(?), I don't know. But to me, digital monochrome seems like an anachronism. If you want the old-time film look, why not shoot film?

Maybe the two trends are related, each one a reaction to the other?
 
Last edited:
Yes, very over done.
 
Velvia started the saturated color fad in 1990. It was reflected when the film makers started making emulsions with HC vs NC...High Contast or High Color Saturation vs. Normal Contrast/Color Saturation. Cibachrome was popular at the same time for printing transparencies with high saturation, too, but at the same time it was recognized as being WRONG for things like Portraits. But film companies made portrait films in HC version nevertheless. At the same time, though, there wre films known for their faithful color rendition,like VPNAll of that predated digital. And faithful color rendition films like VPN ceased to exist.

I agree when the photo looks especially cartoonish, not good.
 
Last edited:

Maybe they’re not trying for the “old-time” film look. Monochrome art didn’t start with film, and the works of the great photographers who work/worked in monochrome certainly don’t look “old-time”. Sometimes color is irrelevant or even a distraction.
 
Ditto. Goya, Whistler, Rembrandt...the list could go on of artists who worked in BW. I can even see shooting digital capture in color with the intention of a BW picture.
As for myself, digital cameras are just too bulky to lug around. Most of them made a Hasselblad look like a miniature camera.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register