Same roll (FP4+) exposed at both EI 50 and EI200 - development?

WPPD25 Self Portrait

A
WPPD25 Self Portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 16
Wife

A
Wife

  • 4
  • 1
  • 68
Dragon IV 10.jpg

A
Dragon IV 10.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 76
DRAGON IV 08.jpg

A
DRAGON IV 08.jpg

  • 1
  • 0
  • 44

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,880
Messages
2,766,324
Members
99,495
Latest member
Brenva1A
Recent bookmarks
0

henpe

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
106
Location
Sweden
Format
Multi Format
I recently put a FP4+ film in one of my cameras an decided to expose it at EI50. Mid-roll, I forgot about the camera for a while and when I took it back in service my memory failed my and I was certain I had HP5+ in it and exposed the remaining frames at EI200. How to develop? I have been thinking about using a two-bath developer, would that be any good? I have been experimenting with Thorntons two-bath developer in the past, but do not know how good it is at pushing?

Suggestions anyone?

(Not that the roll is extremely important to me, but it would be nice to at least get something out of it.)

Best regards
Henrik
 

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,660
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
The 2/3 of a stop underexposure isn't exactly a disaster. I'd favour a developer that would give full film speed and develop normally. Xtol would be my choice.
 

Film-Niko

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
708
Format
Multi Format
Two-bath developer may be one good choice.
Another possibility would be to think about which pictures are more important for you: Those from the first part of the roll, or those from the second part?
Depending on that you could make a choice and set a priority.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,505
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
As mentioned, that's really not enough of a difference in EI to make a difference. I'd just develop it normally. Should be just fine, as that particular film shouldn't be that fussy about a small change in EI.
 

Adrian Bacon

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
2,086
Location
Petaluma, CA.
Format
Multi Format
As mentioned, that's really not enough of a difference in EI to make a difference. I'd just develop it normally. Should be just fine, as that particular film shouldn't be that fussy about a small change in EI.

+1. If you really want to, develop it per Ilford's time for pushing one stop. I wouldn't worry about the frames you exposed at EI 50. They'll be a little dense, but otherwise fine.
 

Dismayed

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
438
Location
Boston
Format
Med. Format RF
The difference between EI 50 and EI 200 is 2 stops. Develop for EI 50 and you'll lose shadow detail for the shots exposed at EI 200. Or develop for EI 200 and deal with dense highlights for the EI 50 exposure. Maybe the best choice is to split the difference.
 
OP
OP

henpe

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
106
Location
Sweden
Format
Multi Format
Thanks all for your input!

I decided to split the difference and develop the roll as if it was exposed at EI 100 (xtol 1+2). It seems to have worked well and all frames seems to be printable; no lost shadows nor any blocked up highlights.

Regards
Henrik
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom