Same focal length, same camera, same film format, the slower one is a zillion times bigger than the other.

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,549
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
The big one is pretty cool, however. They made that monster for the SLX, SL66 and Hassy.
Then new one is not only smaller and faster, it is sharper at the corners. No autofocus, the shortest AF in the series is the 50mm/2.8 AFD.

Shown: Zeiss 40mm/4 Distagon and Schneider 40mm/3.5 Super Angulon for Rollei 6000 series SLR cameras.

 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Do you have any 40mm or 50mm lenses? They made multiple versions over the years for Hasselblad too.

50mm CF lens and Hasselblad 903 SWC which has a 38mm lens [close to 40mm].
 

itsdoable

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
823
Location
Canada
Format
Medium Format
Exaggerated by about a half a zillion times? The original Zeiss 40mm is about 2x larger - which was par for the course with early wide angle lenses.

The cost of the compact size is usually distortion, unfortunately I cannot find a spec sheet for the Schneider.
But distortion can now be minimized in software...

Unfortunately the current trend in digital for highly corrected lenses is that they have now grown more than 2x bigger than the classic high quality film era lenses.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

My lenses do not connect to a computer so how would one correct distortion in software?
 
OP
OP

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,549
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
This thread is in the ANALOG equipment section.
Distortion curves. Super-Angulon on the left and Distagon on the right. Both exhibit a mustache type mixed barrel distortion and pincushion.

 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…