Sally Mann Photographs Removed from Texas Museum Exhibition after Outcry

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,786
Format
35mm

Which I think the entire discussion boils down to.

We're risk adverse. Err on the side of caution.

I have a library of work that is never going to get shared publicly. Nothing to do with decency or clothes but the subject matter would be deemed too sensitive for current day. So it sits in an archive that some day when I'm long gone might be seen. Or not. I'm proud of my work even if I'm the only one who sees it.
 

MTGseattle

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
1,413
Location
Seattle
Format
Multi Format
How many times has Sally Mann explained her motives for her "Immediate family" work? A lot.
Her Children who are the subject of those pictures have also explained their feelings regarding the continued "life" of those images, and If I am remembering correctly wouldn't mind a couple of them going away but are resigned to the status (infamy?) they (the images) have attained.

This to me, seems like just another in a long list of a group pushing its beliefs on the larger community. I'm sure a quick google session could give a potentially offended person the info needed to avoid the content they wish to not see. It's more book banning etc. The "...LGBTQ lifestyle" comment in the letter shows their hand as surely as the use of God so many times. A small group deciding what should and should not be seen based upon their belief structure. Sadly, Florida and Texas seem to be the recent leaders in this stuff.

In a way one could imply the inverse and say the organizers of the show in question are a small group deciding what we should all see, but I really doubt the exhibition was put together by a church group, and one can certainly not go to a given venue. I want to decide what I do not want to see/hear. It's that simple.

The open letter that started this new fervor is an example of why I choose to steer clear of organized religion.
 

Arthurwg

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,761
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format

I'm not sure that a minor child's "permission" to be photographed in the nude has much standing, legally or otherwise. And I'm not at all sure that the impact of those experiences left the "celebrity" children unscathed. Let's remember that her eldest child, Emmitt, took his own life at age 36. An interesting interview with Jessie was published by Aperture in 2001.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,786
Format
35mm


This might get me slapped again but I gotta say what I gotta say.

I've gotten slapped down from the so-called left in the past few years as much as the so-called right. My views and way of life has been under attack in as much as any marginalized group. My own work remains under wraps because of who and what I believe and it is directly attributed to left wing views.

I know that the photographic and arts community generally has a leftist bend. I'm cool with that regardless of my personal views. However to frame this as a Liberal Vs. Conservative censorship game and not be aware of your own sides failings is dishonest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

retina_restoration

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,350
Location
Wilammette Valley, Oregon
Format
35mm RF

*sigh*
I wondered how long it would be before someone attempted to make a connection between Emmet's suicide and his "fame" as a Sally Mann model.

The man developed schizophrenia in adulthood, and I very much doubt you could hang "blame" on his childhood experiences. If anything, I expect his rural paradise environment, and loving "find out who you are and pursue it" parents may have prevented his illness from manifesting sooner and more severely. Suggesting that his upbringing in the hands of a driven, passionate photographer is responsible for his illness is lazy and unkind.

So, there’s an excellent interview with Jesse Mann published in Aperture in 2001. Read it and form your own opinion about the impact Sally’s work had on Jesse and her siblings. No one emerges from childhood unscathed by their experiences. While most people in our village regarded my parents as exceptional parents, I’ve come to view my upbringing as one marked by a certain ineptitude and a lack of guidance from them. At the heart of it all was their insistence that a “good life” could be achieved by finding work that paid a decent living and “fitting in” with society. However, I found neither of these approaches useful, and I believe I would have turned out to be a vastly different person if my parents had recognized my true self and encouraged me to pursue my interests and abilities. Instead, they struggled to guide me towards career choices that would have been detrimental to my well-being.

So, as I say, none of us escapes childhood undamaged.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,678
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
retina_restoration said:
So, as I say, none of us escapes childhood undamaged.
Click to expand...

Just as few emerge from childhood without acquiring some benefit.
I need to read the Jesse Mann interview, but I'm guessing that there was much to appreciate as a result of growing up influenced by such an interesting and talented person as Sally Mann.
 

Arthurwg

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,761
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format

So know you know how long it would take.
This is not an accusation but simply a thought. Yes, the man was said to have developed "schizophrenia" as an adult, but he
seemed to have struggled with his situation way before that. Jessie also seemed to struggle. And yes we have no way of knowing what the impact of childhood actually had on their later lives. I'm reminded of the well known poem by Phillip Larkin: "They fuck you up, your mum and dad." But perhaps most importantly, do you think minor children can actually give legal or otherwise informed. consent to be photographed in the nude, and for profit? She did sell those pictures for a handsome price.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,020
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
On the face of it, from an uninformed viewer, the photos feature nude children. Children are generally not considered to be able to give consent. So, these photos get labelled as indecent and possibly illegal. They don't care what the photographer says. They don't care what the children say. They only care about what they see in the photo.

Anything the photographer says would be seen as defensive.
Anything the (now grown) children say -- the accusers would assume the children were "groomed" or currently stand to gain from the photos circulation.

My point here is that you can't use Sally Mann's intent or subsequent defence of the photos, nor can you use the notion that the children consented and freely participated, to level an argument against the accusers.

What you actually need to do is get the accusers to not see any indecency in the photos. And I wish everyone luck with that.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,694
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format

True, and very sad.... especially since there are folks who will argue the below quote of Jessie with assumptions of grooming and exploitation. Her adult words from the referenced interview are rather clear and believable:

... we enjoyed being photographed. It gave us a sense of beauty. When you’re around an artist all the time, you’re always reminded of what’s beautiful and what’s special, and you can’t forget it. Now, even though we are grown up—and Emmett and I are in college and living apart from her, and Ginna has begun boarding school—we still have that reminder. We got to travel, and meet a lot of great people, and had all this great exposure. So we have to factor those experiences into the moving-out on to our own things.
 

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,757
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8

And you have it on authority that schizophrenia could be caused be the so-called trauma of being photographed nude as a child and any subsequent public display?
 

snusmumriken

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
2,578
Location
Salisbury, UK
Format
35mm
I wondered when Lewis Carroll would be introduced (post #148)! That’s a case that’s almost impossible to understand or resolve since we don’t know Dodgson as a person, nor fully comprehend the norms of the time. In the same era, Frank Meadow Sutcliffe was winning prizes for a photo of naked boys mucking about in the sea. He may even have paid them. But I don’t think there are any doubts about Sutcliffe’s character.

A problem in the present case is that we know some unusual people can get aroused by looking at photos of even pre-pubertal children that to most of us look innocent. The vigilantes fear that by making such images available, a fire is being stoked, and the end result will be paedophilic offending. You could of course say the same about knives or guns or, really, anything that can be both fetishised and misused.

I’m personally inclined to be liberal over nudity, and hostile to Puritanism. Nevertheless, I can also understand why some people fear the worst.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,020
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Pieter12 said:
At a certain age, many children refuse to be photographed, clothed or not. They make faces, run away, don't cooperate.
Click to expand...

Depends on the child and how often a camera appears, I think. My youngest shirked photos from the age of 2. I wasn't going to ask her to consent to anything at that age.

snusmumriken said:
we know some unusual people can get aroused by looking at photos of even pre-pubertal children that to most of us look innocent. The vigilantes fear that by making such images available, a fire is being stoked
Click to expand...

I don't think so. I think the people who protest the showing of the photos simply don't approve. They don't think "right-minded" individuals should be able to look at them and "perverts" prevented - - they think no one should be able to see those photos.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,694
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
It's that and more than that, Don. They have Biblical rationalization for their platform. But if one actually reads the Bible verses that they cite, it seems a bit contextually confused and extreme intererpretaions. There's no way to resolve that with logic, law, or anything else.
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,716
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

I was referring to laws within the US. You live in Canada.
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,716
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Consent has no bearing on violating child pornography laws in Texas. Neither children nor their parents can give consent, The statute clearly states that just having photos, even AI produced pictures, where minors under 18 years are engaging in sexual acts, is illegal and considered child pornography. Now I'm not saying that Mann's photos show sexual acts. In fact they don't and they are just nude photos of children. So it seems that the whole argument about approval is moot in the Mann case at least as far as Texas law is concerned. Approval discussion are more about public perception of approval to community standards unrelated to penal codes.
 

David Brown

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
4,056
Location
Earth
Format
Multi Format
Patrick Robert James said:
Then again, Texas. About all you need to say.
Click to expand...

No, I think you need to say more. What a silly over-generalization. I am a bit offended. (But then, this has nothing to do with Sally Mann. Who, BTW has exhibited and lectured at this same museum before.)
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,596
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
Alan Edward Klein said:
I was referring to laws within the US. You live in Canada.
Click to expand...

Alan, This has nothing to do with where i live. There are lots of places in the USA where these photographs have been/or could be displayed without reactionary incident.
 

Arthurwg

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,761
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
Pieter12 said:
And you have it on authority that schizophrenia could be caused be the so-called trauma of being photographed nude as a child and any subsequent public display?
Click to expand...

Of course I do not, and I don't have it on authority that he really was schizophrenic. That's simply jargon. My only conjecture is that these children may have had a difficult childhood.
 
  • BrianShaw
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Withdrawn

retina_restoration

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2023
Messages
1,350
Location
Wilammette Valley, Oregon
Format
35mm RF

You’re asking an impossible question.
Arthurwg said:
Of course I do not, and I don't have it on authority that he really was schizophrenic. That's simply jargon. My only conjecture is that these children may have had a difficult childhood.
Click to expand...

Introduce me to any child who did not find aspects of their childhood “difficult” and who did not struggle with their circumstances and developing sense of self. And if you did thirty seconds of research into the life of Emmett Mann, you’d know that he was diagnosed schizophrenic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…