• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Rollo vs PMK

Coburg Street

A
Coburg Street

  • 0
  • 1
  • 51
Jesus

A
Jesus

  • 0
  • 1
  • 48

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,732
Messages
2,829,323
Members
100,920
Latest member
wuduwald
Recent bookmarks
0

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
Anyone who has used both of these care to comment on the staining characteristics of Rollo vs PMK. I'm very partial to the PMK staining characteristics, but I've picked up a Unicolor drum and reversing motorbase, and I'd like to use it for 8x10. Anybody using PMK in drums by modifying the ratio?

Fine as it is, I'm not interested in Pyrocat BTW- I'm after the green/yellow stain.
 

Kerik

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
1,634
Location
California
Format
Large Format
I've used both for many years. Very similar staining characteristics. I prefer rollo (in trays or rotary) due to shorter development times and less base fog on films like the older HP5+. I only use PMK if I shoot a contrasty film like FP4 in contrasty lighting situations - i.e. not very often. I shoot HP5+ when the light is hard and FP4+ when the light is soft. BTW, my negs are intended for pt/pd/gum printing. I did some brief tests with Pyrocat HD a few years back and decided I liked the Rollo results better. If it ain't broke...
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
20,020
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Another option that some people say works, if you want to stick with PMK, in a drum is to replace the developer halfway through the development time with fresh developer. I don't drum process in general, so I haven't tried this myself (or maybe I did once while I was experimenting with processing in print drums, but don't recall how it turned out).
 

Kirk Keyes

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Messages
3,234
Location
Portland, OR
Format
4x5 Format
Or, upgrade to a Jobo and use add a nitrogen tank to put an inert layer of gas (nitrogen) in the tank as the developer works. One time expense of a tank, regulator, and some simple tygon tubing and all you ever have to do is get your tank filled up occasionally. As long as you remember to turn the gas off after the developer step, even a small tank will last a long time.

Not only will you be able to get plus development levels that are not possible with PMK (or Pyrocat, or WDd2D, or [filll in the blank with your favorite pyro based developer]) in rotary tanks that are open to the air, but you will even get shorter development times as the developer holds it's activity when the nitrogen keeps the oxygen/air away.

I haven't used this with Rollo, but I have with PMK, and Pyrocat, and WD2H.
 

msage

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 22, 2003
Messages
437
Location
Washington State
Format
Large Format
Anyone who has used both of these care to comment on the staining characteristics of Rollo vs PMK. I'm very partial to the PMK staining characteristics, but I've picked up a Unicolor drum and reversing motorbase, and I'd like to use it for 8x10. Anybody using PMK in drums by modifying the ratio?

Fine as it is, I'm not interested in Pyrocat BTW- I'm after the green/yellow stain.

Jason
I have use Rollo Pyro for a number years and like the greenish/yellow stain. I compared the stains a few years ago and I found them very similar. The Rollo is easier to use and has good keeping qualities. I have followed the basic intructions and dilutions, they work well for me.

Michael
 

jp80874

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
3,488
Location
Bath, OH 442
Format
ULarge Format
I don't know about the Unicolor drum, but when calculating times for the Jobo tanks you need to remember that there is 20 second pour stage that must be counted in your development time. My normal Rollo Pyro development time at 72 degrees F is 6 minutes 25 seconds, plus the 20 seconds pour out, plus 20 seconds pour in water to stop development, plus pouring that wash out, plus a second wash of water to stop the development, and pour out, then pour in Fixer. No other steps in the Rollo process are critical, but those are.

John Powers
 

nze

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 12, 2004
Messages
714
Location
France
Format
Multi Format
Rollo is less tricky than PMK but both have the same stain. I am a PMK User but as a trick for any way I develop.
In tank for 35mm and 120 it is really better when you agitate every 15 sec.
for 8X10 and other sheet film I develop then in small drum and do the same with great succes. I always dio the after treatment , but never do the long watr bath , my fim are already enough yellow green
 
OP
OP
JBrunner

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for the great info everybody. I'm going to order some Rollo, and see how it does for me.
 
OP
OP
JBrunner

JBrunner

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
7,429
Location
PNdub
Format
Medium Format
Here's the results of the first try with Rollo. I'm pleased with the stain. Should increase a bit with as it dries. the bad snap shows more contrast than there is(the eyes aren't that dark), i'm mostly looking at the stain, which is very PMKish. Yippee! I'm gonna print one of these tonight.
 

Attachments

  • 0430081136.jpg
    0430081136.jpg
    12.6 KB · Views: 189

frotog

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
730
Location
third stone
Format
Large Format
Or, upgrade to a Jobo and use add a nitrogen tank to put an inert layer of gas (nitrogen) in the tank as the developer works. One time expense of a tank, regulator, and some simple tygon tubing and all you ever have to do is get your tank filled up occasionally. As long as you remember to turn the gas off after the developer step, even a small tank will last a long time.

Not only will you be able to get plus development levels that are not possible with PMK (or Pyrocat, or WDd2D, or [filll in the blank with your favorite pyro based developer]) in rotary tanks that are open to the air, but you will even get shorter development times as the developer holds it's activity when the nitrogen keeps the oxygen/air away.

I haven't used this with Rollo, but I have with PMK, and Pyrocat, and WD2H.

I second Kirk's nitrogen gas recommendation. Not only are times shorter but base+fog is considerably less than without the gas. In rotary, PMK works so well with nitrogen that Rollo is not necessary. While the Rollo stain is quite pretty when observed backlit on a lightbox, a print from the Rollo neg. is no match for a print from a similarly exposed PMK neg.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,115
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Here's the results of the first try with Rollo. I'm pleased with the stain. Should increase a bit with as it dries. the bad snap shows more contrast than there is(the eyes aren't that dark), i'm mostly looking at the stain, which is very PMKish. Yippee! I'm gonna print one of these tonight.

Looking at the image here, I had to ask...

Is that a photograph of "She Who Must Be Obeyed"?:smile:

Matt
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom