• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Rollie infrared film

sly

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
1,675
Location
Nanaimo
Format
Multi Format
If you want the infrared look, a 25 red filter is not enough. I need to get an 87 and try again with it.
 

Photoe

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
36
Format
4x5 Format
An 89B with about 5 stops of filter factor works nicely
 

Travis Nunn

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 3, 2005
Messages
1,601
Location
Midlothian, VA
Format
Medium Format
a simple search here on APUG turned up lots of hits...

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,104
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The digitaltruth links referred to in the first of Travis' referred to threads are good.

The image in the attachment is a result from my first experience with this film.

Here's the accompanying details:

Location: Ladner, British Columbia, Canada
Equipment Used: Mamiya C220, 65mm lens
Exposure: 2 seconds @ f/16
Film & Developer: Rollie IR 400 @ EI 12!, HC 110 Dil B, 8.75 minutes @ 20C
Paper & Developer: Negative Scan
Filter: Hoya R72

Hope this helps.

Matt
 

Attachments

  • forest01d.jpg
    161.9 KB · Views: 153