Rolleiflex White Face with 1961 lens?

Watering time

A
Watering time

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Cyan

D
Cyan

  • 1
  • 0
  • 7
Sunset & Wine

D
Sunset & Wine

  • 3
  • 0
  • 13
Adam Smith

A
Adam Smith

  • 1
  • 0
  • 66
Adam Smith

A
Adam Smith

  • 4
  • 0
  • 86

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,098
Messages
2,786,123
Members
99,808
Latest member
JasmineMcHugh
Recent bookmarks
1

fotopan

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
14
Location
Poland
Format
35mm
I have a 2.8F Rolleiflex with body characteristics of a late model (white face, with "ears" on advance side indicating 12/24 mechanism, without actual 12/24 switch) however with a Xenotar taking lens that according to the serial number (7083xxx) is from 1961. Is it possible my camera left factory like that, or has it had it been modified somehow in the past to be like that now?
 

Nitroplait

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Messages
813
Location
Europe (EU)
Format
Multi Format
A photo would probably help, but it is not unthinkable that cameras are married with parts from compatible cameras of different eras during repairs.
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,157
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
Where is the camera serial number engraved, on the "white face plate" or on top of the nameplate? Is the focus scale in both feet and meters?
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,557
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Without any service records or provenance, it may be difficult to know what a previous owner did to the camera. Pictures may help.
 
OP
OP

fotopan

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
14
Location
Poland
Format
35mm
Here are some photos of this beauty. The camera has definitely been used, often without a case, it certainly hasn't been left on a shelf all its life!

20240505_184734.jpg


20240505_185131.jpg


20240505_185048.jpg
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,157
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
Everything looks correct for a late 2,8F, but the Xenotar looks indeed to be from an older batch, but it's optically the same as the later batches. The viewing and taking lenses were matched at the factory. Maybe the Heidosmat had a focal length of 82,3 and this Xenotar matched? When the "white face" versions were made they weren't really mass produced anymore. It could of course be a replacement lens.
 
OP
OP

fotopan

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
14
Location
Poland
Format
35mm
It didn't occur to me that the lenses might have had to be matched in pairs at the factory - it seemed natural to me that all lenses (both viewing and taking) had identical focal lengths for a specific camera model. Was it really the case that some Heidosmat viewing lenses could have a slightly different focal length and therefore it was necessary to look for a matching taking lens (or vice versa, choose a Heidosmat for a specific Planar or Xenotar)?
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,157
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
Yes, the lenses had some focal length variation, so it was measured and written down, and the taking and viewing lenses matched and collimated.

It's the same with other cameras, like the lenses for folders. Some have one, two or three thin spacers behind the shutter to compensate for the small difference in focal length.

"80 mm" could in reality be something like 79,5 to 81,3 mm or thereabouts.
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom