I have both a Rolleicord and a 2.8 Rolleiflex. I've owned a 3.5 Rolleiflex in the past and traded it in for the extra stop of speed.
I had a Rolleicord V, lost it in the flood.
I replaced it with a Rolleiflex MX something or other. The photos from both are very nice, however the Rolleiflex handles much nicer with its hand crank film advance, and loads easier. The Flex is heavier and more robusty built.
Either cameras are capable of top notch images.
The screens are a bit dark on each and it might be worth the money to upgrade the screen for better low light focusing.
Nick, are you sure your repair man is up to speed on Rolleis? I find it puzzling for a Xenotar to be soft at any f-stop.
Richard Wasserman
Richard -- yes, he's Krikor Maralian (Krimar Photo Shop), who's a Rollei specialist.
I had a rolleicord VA. It was soft wide open esp in corners but at f8 and below was super sharp.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?