WRSchmalfuss
Member
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
- Messages
- 197
- Format
- Medium Format
Who would like to judge the new ROLLEI SCANFILM CN 400 PRO already now, nevertheless, please might given several IDENTICAL exposed films, to DIFFERENT photo labs, for an proper C-41 processing. As we of MACO/ROLLEI, the tester will then recognize, that the C-41 PROCESING is determining the quality of this film. With this film, probably more clearly then with others, merciless, the lack of a bad film processing are pointed out.
It is surely too early for MACO/ROLLEI, to announce on the basis still, much to fewer practical tests, any final opinions. NOT without reason, the official introduction on the market takes place in APRIL 2007, as announced on the Photokina in Cologne. For the now already made active critics, MACO/ROLLEI thanks to all for the commitment, and to those, which contacted MACO/ROLLEI directly, offerd the transmittal of free test films.
MOMENTARILY, it concerns NOT particularly the color interpretations, or over more or less large grain, but the film technology actually! THIS is completely deviating from that, which is offered to the specialized professional consumer, at present, by FUJI and/or KODAK. The fivehundred years durability (ESTAR) of the poyester film carrier, the optimal usefulness as B&W film replacement, without qualitative losses in tonality, and/or the conversion of color to grey tones.
Who concentrates now alone on the partial aspect, like the GRAIN only, he jumped -still- too briefly.
Regards
It is surely too early for MACO/ROLLEI, to announce on the basis still, much to fewer practical tests, any final opinions. NOT without reason, the official introduction on the market takes place in APRIL 2007, as announced on the Photokina in Cologne. For the now already made active critics, MACO/ROLLEI thanks to all for the commitment, and to those, which contacted MACO/ROLLEI directly, offerd the transmittal of free test films.
MOMENTARILY, it concerns NOT particularly the color interpretations, or over more or less large grain, but the film technology actually! THIS is completely deviating from that, which is offered to the specialized professional consumer, at present, by FUJI and/or KODAK. The fivehundred years durability (ESTAR) of the poyester film carrier, the optimal usefulness as B&W film replacement, without qualitative losses in tonality, and/or the conversion of color to grey tones.
Who concentrates now alone on the partial aspect, like the GRAIN only, he jumped -still- too briefly.
Regards
