Well the PO 100C (Efke emulsion) film was a very nice film with specifications like the Acros 100 from Fuji but had some problems in 2002-2004. One was the Q.C. of the emulsion and they had once a big batch configured with nasty 35mm cassettes. They were simply stucked halfway which was a very bad experience.
However Rollei/Maco has now a state of the art new 35mm configuration plant in Bergheim, Germany.
If Efke can made a good job on the emulsion side this can be a very nice film. It seems to be it will be available in 35mm, 120 roll film (assembled by Efke or Foma) and 4x5", 9x12cm, 5x7" and 8x10".
So hope for the best at Photokina time in Cologne/Köln.
Best regards,
Robert
(Has already some PO100C as test material available)
Well the PO 100C (Efke emulsion) film was a very nice film with specifications like the Acros 100 from Fuji
Do these specifications include reciprocity characteristics of Acros?
As we all know Maco is not a film manufacturer but a marketing company that relabels mainly Agfa films
I will be able to test 10 rolls of this film next week. So i will post my testresults and experiences here on APUG.
If the film is available in months
But in the meanwhile the bar was raised by the new Tmax 400 - it looks like a good 100 ASA film, it's easy to get the right exposure, it's easy to process. So, why bother for 100 ASA? If I want an even finer grain and sharpness well beyond an old APX 100 I use a Tmax 100 (panchromatic) and an Acros (somewhat ortho), both of them outclass all APX-style films - old or new, faked or not.
Can't wait to try
Well a raw scan (6x7cm) from Rollei Retro 100 Tonal. Souped in AM74/RHS 1+9 6:00 minutes.
Any tests how the stuff would work in Rodinal?
Well a raw scan (6x7cm) from Rollei Retro 100 Tonal. Souped in AM74/RHS 1+9 6:00 minutes.
Subject: River Labe/Elbe.
Compared to the Rollei Retro 100 (APX 100) less grain and also a large tonality.
The Polyester 100 micron base is pretty flat but keep the backing paper tight on the roll because the base is clear and you do not want to fog the last negative.
The original on the flickr is quite a bit larger.
I can't see anything on flickr. has the picture already been removed? If so, very bad style!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?