Rollei CR 200: Should I have to downrate it?

St. Clair Beach Solitude

D
St. Clair Beach Solitude

  • 8
  • 2
  • 104
Reach for the sky

H
Reach for the sky

  • 3
  • 4
  • 141
Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 3
  • 2
  • 174

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,873
Messages
2,782,391
Members
99,738
Latest member
fergusfan
Recent bookmarks
0

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,478
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
Has anyone else found Rollei's CR 200 slide film (or Agfa RSX II, apparently the same emulsion) to need a bit of downrating?

I'm not sure I've gotten it right yet, but when I've shot it at 200, the slides clearly were a little underexposed, and I'm now experimenting with rating it at 160 instead. I'd assumed this was a metering issue with the camera I was using (it's a 1970s rangefinder that expects 1.35V and is getting 1.5V instead), but I just compared the meter on that camera with a Canon AE-1, which has historically metered quite well, and found them nicely aligned. So I'm thinking the camera may be metering correctly, and I'm actually finding that the film needs a bit of downrating compared to box speed.

Am I nuts?

-NT
 

WRSchmalfuss

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Messages
197
Format
Medium Format
Rollei Digibase CR200

This slide film will be my only film for the near future to feed my medium format cameras and my scanner. The film emulsion is in opposite to the former Agfa RSX 200, now coated on a modern polyester film base.

Especially, I like the natural colors of this film very much for landscape, portrait and close-up photography! The roll film is easy to handle, sufficient sharp and has a fine grain for a ISO 200 film, and the film is easy for scanning. The film should have also the capacity to be pushed up to ISO 400 and more.

Cheers:wink:
 

Ektagraphic

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
2,927
Location
Southeastern
Format
Medium Format
I shot it at 200 and I really like it. I did find that it looked good just a little (not much) underexposed.......
 

SMG

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
26
Format
35mm
Having shot about 10 rolls of AGFA Chrome 200 (which is akin if not the same as RSX II) I find that it does do better underexposed a bit. I have been metering it at ISO200 but have found that the results are better when I underexpose by 1 stop or so. I have been running this film with a circular polarizer on my Mamiya 645 and rating it at 160 on the Sekonic when metering. I should have some rolls next week that will tell if this works, but I suspect that it will be more underexposed than I wanted. I think I should have metered it at 125 with the CP. We'll see soon. I will post some scans when I get this stuff processed.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom