Rollei Blackbird film

streondj

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
10
Format
Plastic Cameras
Dear simon ilford photo.
Calling acetate archival is like saying,
"anything can be archived" if it's cold enough,
ya mammoths are archival too I guess.

In order to make acetate archival grade,
you have to keep them in a dry fridge.
however at room temperature it's lifetime is decades.
Triacetate film is also sensitive to humidity and water.

Whereas glass, paper, and polyester can all be stored at room temperature for centuries.

Polyester will always outlive the binder and color.
Also you can store polyester film in your library,
where albums and other records belong.

I don't know anyone that keeps a dry fridge in their library.
And the fridge in my kitchen is too humid,
mold grows in food left too long,
as with most kitchen fridges,
unsuitable for acetate film.

In terms of the camera winding mechanism,
it can be repaired, even reinforced.

If polyester film is so much cheaper, then Ilford should make some.
Hey perhaps can even "innovate" and make some vegan film, with gum arabic binder.
Then I and other healthy young people expecting to live a long time, would have reason to buy your film.

Otherwise Rollei knows where it's at with polyester! Woo hoo :-D
They are often sold out, even in online stores.
Obviously other people know its benefits also.
Gonna have to order direct from Germany,
bulk of course, it's worth it .

Logan Streondj longevity enthusiast.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,603
Location
Iowa
Format
Multi Format
Considering that there are negatives around from the 20s and 30's in box/folding cameras that are still good, I'm going to call bullshit on this. Those films were invariably NOT stored in ideal environments and the film base is still fine. The *emulsion* may have gone bad, but that isn't the fault of the base.

 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
I am afraid that most on APUG would side with Mr Galley on the archival aspect of today's acetate base. What are your credentials Mr Streondj?
 

brucemuir

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2007
Messages
2,228
Location
Metro DC are
Format
Multi Format
Then I and other healthy young people expecting to live a long time, would have reason to buy your film.

Logan Streondj longevity enthusiast.

IDK you could buy it because in the right hands it's capable of producing beautiful images.
Seems like a good enough reason for this old unhealthy person that expects to live for a while yet :devil:
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,312
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
while it is true that Acetate can break down, particularly if stored in areas of high temperature and Humidity, accompanied by rusty metal, it is relatively stable. High humidity can also allow the groth of fungus on any type of film, so keeping the humidity down is always to the good.

Poly film is used for industrial photography, (such as shooting from aircraft, etc) as it is very dimensionally stable and very tough. This is the same reason is is used for Motion Picture PRINT film. On the minus side it is curly, and attracts dust.

I shot an old roll of HP5 Motor drive film from my freezer this summer, it was of course rather fogged but still worked. I used a canon 300V as most of my canons stop after 36 shots no matter how much film they have. I still have the special Stainless Tank and reel, but the filling cap has been misplaced. I managed with some gaffer tape.

Most movie negative is still Acetate.
 

NedL

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
3,388
Location
Sonoma County, California
Format
Multi Format
I've just clicked on a few APUIG profiles and checked a few ages. After a quick and dirty calculation I see the average age of a typicall APUG user is 93.

Maybe I'm tired right now but I'm still laughing. I'm only 51 and honestly I don't know what a hipster is. That's OK. I'm glad there are young people shooting film.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format


Good point, but were are those?

see here:
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

(Well, following steven's argumentation, maybe it's not even necessary to see them, as long as the effect is in the company results.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

streondj

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
10
Format
Plastic Cameras
I am afraid that most on APUG would side with Mr Galley on the archival aspect of today's acetate base. What are your credentials Mr Streondj?

Perhaps they would out of wishful thinking *shrugs*.

I read and research things I'm interested in.
Really you don't have to take my word for it,
it's common knowledge amongst most archivists.
I've read plenty of sources and textbooks about photography that mention it.

hmmm I'm pretty sure it's acetate that's curly,
I know at least rollei superpan has no curling layers so it's flat.
dust eh? well typically it's stored in an album, so that's hardly an issue.

Most movie negative is still Acetate.
ya, how unfortunate for those movies..

source: https://www.imagepermanenceinstitute.org/webfm_send/308

Point being, even if you go through the trouble of freezing all your negatives now,
there is no guarantee that they'll continue to be frozen for generations to come,
so may as well put them on a film that'll be stable at room temperature.

From a cost-analysis perspective, acetate film is more expensive,
since on the long term, have to spend energy freezing it.
Which is more emissions, and toxins in the atmosphere.

Whereas polyester will do great on a book shelf,
in an album, with the photos and records.
cheaper and more eco-friendly .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
You made some good points!
Even more could bed added.


However, so far I know the dramatic cases of vinegar syndrome have only been reported about tightly spooled films (eg.cine films), not on films stored in paper sleeves. Aside of that longevity prognosis in general is somewhat tricky.


But more important: IlfordPhoto seemingly has become the holy cow here at Apug, so you likely won't get much approval here.
 

georg16nik

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
1,101
Format
Multi Format
Considering that there are negatives around from the 20s and 30's in box/folding cameras that are still good..
Those are cellulose nitrate films.
Triacetate is ca. 1950 - ..
Cold (-15° to 4° C) and dry (30% to 40% relative humidity) environments are the only means of preserving nitrate and triacetate originals over long periods of time.
Polyester is ca. 1955 - ..
Black & white negatives on polyester support may be stored at a temperature of 18° C or lower and a relative humidity of 30% to 40%.
Color negatives on polyester support require cold storage for their long term preservation.

.....
However, so far I know the dramatic cases of vinegar syndrome have only been reported about tightly spooled films (eg.cine films), not on films stored in paper sleeves. Aside of that longevity prognosis in general is somewhat tricky.

At room temp acetate films stored in soft paper can out-gas to some extend the acid fumes, thus slowing down the base to eat itself up.
Acetate films in Glassine or Clear File (polypropylene) sleeves does not breathe well.

The deterioration process is auto-catalytic and moisture and temperature dependent.
 

dsmccrac

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2012
Messages
62
Format
Multi Format
OK so glassline are no better than the plastic ones for off gassing?

I not using the glassline any more - another PrintFile user - but I remember my first photo instructor praising the glassline for archival reasons. I think I moved to PrintFiles for ease of contact printing (which I do not do any more-I scan everything and print 'contact sheets' in iphoto)

I have found this an interesting post. I want long term archiving (I was not aware that the acetate base we use now is different from the stuff from the 20's) but polyester concerns me as I have torn sprocket holes on some film and want my film to give before the gears do!!

I also want to keep using the films I love so maybe I just need to look at my storage methods.
 

desertrat

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2005
Messages
228
Location
Boise, ID
Format
Multi Format
Stephanie Brim said:
Considering that there are negatives around from the 20s and 30's in box/folding cameras that are still good..

I don't know about Europe, but in the U.S., nitrate roll films were replaced by acetate long before 1920. Amateur motion picture films went to acetate early on, too. Only professional motion picture films continued to use nitrate base into the 1940s.
 

georg16nik

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
1,101
Format
Multi Format
I don't know about Europe, but in the U.S., nitrate roll films were replaced by acetate long before 1920. Amateur motion picture films went to acetate early on, too. Only professional motion picture films continued to use nitrate base into the 1940s.

Perhaps You are referring to:
diacetate ca. 1923 – ca. 1955
or Mixed esters:
acetate propionate 1927 – ca. 1949
acetate butyrate - 1936 – today

Triacetate was made after 1950 due to the availability and lower cost of methylene chloride.
 

georg16nik

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
1,101
Format
Multi Format

Glassine pH at time of manufacture is 6.8-7.5 but is unbuffered, so pH value is expected to drop when exposed to normal
atmospheric conditions.
There are acid-free paper products, buffered against acid deterioration - pH 8.0-8.5 mostly they use calcium carbonate buffer.
Usually available from library suppliers.

Polyester could be a challenge for 35mm auto-everything cameras.
I haven't experienced problems with manual 35mm ones or MF. Light piping might be tricky when load / unload film sometimes.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
As clarification to the posts above:

All acetate-films (the film base) are made from a syrop-like mass containing an organic solvent, coated onto a heated base and coold down. The so-called tri-acetate films (most common) have features superior to other acetate-films, but need a solvent, that for long time was expensive (even though getting recycled for the greatest part). As an alternative to offer safety film-base other acetate-films were used, as films based on di-acetate or mixed acetates.

That acetate is standing in principle for short side-chains to the long cellulosis-chain, might these side-chains now based on one type of chain as in di- or tri-acetate, or a mixture of different chains as in aceto-proprionate, aceto-butyrate.
But as you see aceto/acetate is always involved, which hints at the origin from acetic-acid.

To the degree those mixed acetates were used on large scale production, sources vary to great extend.


That aceto-bond is the weak linkage and the cause for degradation.
Furthermore acetate-films may contain a softener that in long-term perspective is volatile.
Both the linkage and the softener issue is seen in the old nitrate-films too.

This is why some see a similar problem to come as experienced with nitrate-films, lacking of course that problem of ignition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Many improvements have been made in the preparation of acetate films since their first inception. Vinegarization stories always involve older negatives. Both Ilford and Kodak say acetate films are archival and I accept their word on the matter.
 

georg16nik

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
1,101
Format
Multi Format
Many improvements have been made in the preparation of acetate films since their first inception. Vinegarization stories always involve older negatives. Both Ilford and Kodak say acetate films are archival and I accept their word on the matter.

They are archival, when frozen:

  • Maximum Temperature 36°F / 2°C and Relative Humidity Range of 20% to 50%
  • Maximum Temperature 41°F / 5°C and Relative Humidity Range of 20% to 40%
  • Maximum Temperature 45°F / 7°C and Relative Humidity Range of 20% to 30%
As per ISO Standard 18911 - Processed safety photographic films -- Storage practices
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=46602

and here some publications from Rochester Institute of Technology
https://www.imagepermanenceinstitute.org/resources/publications
 

heterolysis

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
173
Location
Hamilton
Format
Multi Format
All of my dad's negatives from prior to 1972 (40+ years, for all the 93-year-olds that are fuzzy on math nowadays ) are still in perfect shape. They have been stored in a damp basement no colder than 20C for almost all of that time. Will they go bad in another 10 years? I'll update you when apug's 20th rolls around. In the meantime, I'll use the time to scan all 4600 frames!

As for the "hipster" comments earlier in the thread --- I find it silly that we can say plastic cameras aren't real cameras and then talk here about pinholes with a straight face---a Ford Focus is no BMW, but it's still a car. As someone much younger than 93 (25 in fact), I can say that even since I picked up a camera film has become harder and harder to find. If I can buy "hipster" film at my local art store, so be it. $15 3-packs aren't a terrible deal these days as chances are there are only two other places in town selling "real" film. Sure $3 Arista exists, but it's not $3 by the time I get it up to Canada.

The biggest problem with the new lomo films (and the reason this thread started) is the lack of data available for processing. I bought a 3-pack of Lomo B&W when on vacation and unable to find any other films, and I ended up having to guess the development for my roll of Lady Grey 400 as there was no data for DD-X. Luckily I was pushing it several stops and the exact time, whether 7 or 8min for example, became less significant.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
All of my dad's negatives from prior to 1972 (40+ years, for all the 93-year-olds that are fuzzy on math nowadays ) are still in perfect shape. They have been stored in a damp basement no colder than 20C for almost all of that time.

Family photographs from the 1930's to the present stored in hot and humid Florida climate also show no vinegarization,
 

georg16nik

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
1,101
Format
Multi Format
All of my dad's negatives from prior to 1972 (40+ years, for all the 93-year-olds that are fuzzy on math nowadays ) are still in perfect shape. They have been stored in a damp basement no colder than 20C for almost all of that time...

Please, share Your family storage practices.. millions archivist, photographers and cinematographers are gonna be very thankful

Family photographs from the 1930's to the present stored in hot and humid Florida climate also show no vinegarization,

Yes, I remember that You shared this in other threads.
Perhaps You are using Kodak molecular sieve acid scavenger?
http://motion.kodak.com/motion/Support/Technical_Information/Storage/molecular.htm
 

Andy K

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2004
Messages
9,420
Location
Sunny Southe
Format
Multi Format


Thank you for posting this information Mustafa. I am very tempted by this film.
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,312
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
hmmm I'm pretty sure it's acetate that's curly,

Poly film is subject to what is called "Core Set" where if it has been currled up, it will tend to want to stay currled up. So Poly sheet film may indeed be flater than acetate sheet film. But Poly roll film will likly show some "set" and want to stay currled.

As far as longevity of the two bases, the Poly is More stable, but acetate these days is also quite good. The factors that are known to cause problems with acetate are also bad for the image. I am sure that an archivist wanting to keep Poly film "forever" would also try to justify cold starage, particularly if the image was in colour.
 

streondj

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
10
Format
Plastic Cameras
Core-set is okay, considering that if it's stored flat in an album,
it'll have a tendency to continue to be flat *shrugs*.
It just means that polyester has some memory.

Ya, chromogenic films require cold storage.
blackbird the topic of this thread is however a black and white film, so should be fine at room temperature.

I'm actually considering developing a longevity-film for color, based on autochrome,
but using fewer layers, but with chemically stable mineral pigments,
then could develop it with eco-friendly B&W developer also .
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Core set is not okay. Buckles induced from roller in the film transport system could form problems at the image plane.
 

georg16nik

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
1,101
Format
Multi Format
...
Ya, chromogenic films require cold storage.
blackbird the topic of this thread is however a black and white film, so should be fine at room temperature...

Fine at room temperature for how long?
With stable bases like poly the emulsion might shrink more than the base at room temp

Charles is spot on that every type requires cold storage.
The Polyester B&W ones are less demanding in the short run but You still need reasonable relative humidity and in the long run You will resort to cold storage.

All color films, regardless base support need cold storage. Those dyes will fade at room temp and it doesn't mater if the emulsion is coated on triacetate or polyester. The only way to slow down fading is cold storage.

The color production from movie industry is usually "printed" on YCM separation archival masters - black-and-white polyester film stock and its normally cold stored as well, not without a reason.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…