Well nevermind...I already tried it out
First batch were the ATP and Kodak TP for 6 minutes in Rollei RLC, no stop used.
Rollei came out perfectly fine though next time I will treat them as a 32 instead of the 40 now, just to see what difference it would make. It looks really contrasty but with a smooth gradiency if that makes sense. Very powerful negs, maybe a tinytiny tad overdeveloped when looking at the numbering.
Now, the TechPan is a different story. It so needed a longer development. So that experience kind of failed although I know what to change in the future, but I'm not sure if that's worth it as I don't have that many films left.
I'll eat my loss this time and develop it or again in the HC110 or in the Technidol of which I still have one package.
Second batch were the ATP and Kodak TP for 5 minutes in the HC110.
For the ATP it was, as I expected looking at the previous results, a tad overdeveloped. Not too shabby but I lost detail in the highlights. Will try a more dilluted HC110 next time as a shorter time will probably lead to a too short time..? <---- merely a guess...?
The TP actually looked really soft compared to the ATP haha! But really nice. Very contrasty but very detailed and still subtle. Will have to give them a closer look tomorrow for a second opinion. Have to see the contact prints and scans tomorrow and search for a suitable image for printing.
Anyways a startling evening with lots of different results. Overall I'm very pleased and surprised by the ATP so far. I think the Tri-X will soon be out of my stock and I will keep on experimenting with these wonderful films
That was about it for now I guess...