What I'm not sure I understand is the role played by sodium thiosulfate in Farmer's reducer. What, exactly is its impact? Can I still re-develop if my solution contains both potassium bromide and sodium thiosulfate, or is that cancelled because of the sodium thiosulfate? Do I still need to fix the print afterwards?
FWIW, I always fix after using Farmer's Reducer, because I always fix after using a re-halogenating bleach.
Just in case the amount of thiosulfate concentration in the Farmer's reducer is off.
And to be sure.
Of course, sometimes I wear a belt and suspenders too.
Does anyone know what the role of Potassium bromide is in Farmer's Reducer?
Does anyone know what the role of Potassium bromide is in Farmer's Reducer?
But Farmer's Reducer works without bromide. See, for example:
Will the real Farmer's Reducer formula please stand up?
The versions of this formula in the Darkroom Cookbook (both 3rd and 4th editions) lists 60.0 grams of Potassium ferricyanide and 30.0 grams of Potassium bromide in water to make 250ml for Solution A. Most of the internet sources I've looked at recently call for 64.0 grams of Potassium...www.photrio.com
Does anyone know what the role of Potassium bromide is in Farmer's Reducer?
Which is not the most fortunate excerpt, in all honesty. One of the things he mentions in relation to fixing is that "...the fix converts everything to plain metallic silver". This is not the case! He continues: 'the bromide bubbles off into solution' - which is not technically correct, although less problematic from a practical viewpoint than the other mishap. I don't doubt Rudman's understanding of what does happen, but the way he formulated it in that specific bit is really unfortunate. He also stats that "at this point [after fixing] we can put the lights on", which of course is true, but it doesn't mean you can't turn the lights on earlier if you use a stop bath.In addition to reddesert's excellent explanation, here's Tim Rudman's:
A more interesting question for me is how potassium ferricyanide bleaches a silver image when used alone, without bromide or thiosulfate.
it is a little ironic that "Farmer's reducer" is an oxidizing agent, not a reducing agent.
A more interesting question for me is how potassium ferricyanide bleaches a silver image when used alone, without bromide or thiosulfate.
Doremus
Yeah, it's funny, isn't it?It had never occurred to me until this thread, that it is a little ironic that "Farmer's reducer" is an oxidizing agent, not a reducing agent.
You'll see that the question was answered twice above in more chemically sound terms. More importantly, Doremus was inquiring after the situation where hypo is not present, and only a solution of ferricyanide is applied. Concerning the term 'buffer', in a chemical sense this has a particular meaning; see e.g. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_solution It does not apply here, although technically speaking, a bleach can be (and in commercial chemistry often is) buffered.Yes it does. but it works harshly. Not being photographic chemist, off hand I'd say the the hypo works as a sort of buffer, for lack of a better term in my vocabulary.
Found many answers to my questions regarding bleach in various Phototrio threads, except those regarding sodium thiosulfate.
I do understand the role of the potassium ferricyanide, of course, and also understand that the addition of potassium bromide makes the bleach a rehalogenating bleach, meaning I can re-develop the print.
What I'm not sure I understand is the role played by sodium thiosulfate in Farmer's reducer. What, exactly is its impact? Can I still re-develop if my solution contains both potassium bromide and sodium thiosulfate, or is that cancelled because of the sodium thiosulfate? Do I still need to fix the print afterwards?
I use this formula from the latest edition of The Darkroom Cookbook:
View attachment 407519
If you remove the thiosulfate, the ferricyanide bleaching action results in virtually colorless and invisible silver ferrocyanide complexes as highlighted above by @Raghu Kuvempunagar . So also without thiosulfate the action is immediately visible.so the effect of bleaching is immediately visible during bleaching
Arguably, bleaching and fixing separately gives more control because you can go back if you overdo the bleaching step, at least if you use a rehalogenating bleach.thereby having more control over the process If you bleach and then fix
This is factually incorrect as anyone can attest to who has done this. The resulting 'blix' remains active for quite some time and in practice more than long enough to work on a print or negative. While it is not long-term stable and it is indeed recommended to mix prior to use in the quantity needed for the session, the 'within minutes' qualification is overly pessimistic.mixing bleach with thiosulfate is not recommended because the mixture loses activity within minutes
The resulting 'blix' remains active for quite some time and in practice more than long enough to work on a print or negative. While it is not long-term stable and it is indeed recommended to mix prior to use in the quantity needed for the session, the 'within minutes' qualification is overly pessimistic.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?