Having been away from film for about 5 years, I was back into 35mm with Tmax. My old go-to setup was Xtol replenished full strength, for wet printing. Now, I am looking to scan the negs and digitially print. Thus I would have some control over contrast hopefully better than with chemistry. Tempted to try Rodinal, as that is a really punchy developer, but in 35 probably not good for grain. Any opinions on this approach?
Having been away from film for about 5 years, I was back into 35mm with Tmax. My old go-to setup was Xtol replenished full strength, for wet printing. Now, I am looking to scan the negs and digitially print. Thus I would have some control over contrast hopefully better than with chemistry. Tempted to try Rodinal, as that is a really punchy developer, but in 35 probably not good for grain. Any opinions on this approach?
I used Tmax100 and Rodinal for may years and always had great tonality and exceptionally fine grain, you won't see any significant difference compared to replenished Xtol as both are excellent with Tmax 100 & 400.
It does so well with 35mm Tmax 100 that some think prints from the negatives were shot on 120 film. I never got the soot and whitewash contrast that Chris seems to get.
Having been away from film for about 5 years, I was back into 35mm with Tmax. My old go-to setup was Xtol replenished full strength, for wet printing. Now, I am looking to scan the negs and digitially print. Thus I would have some control over contrast hopefully better than with chemistry. Tempted to try Rodinal, as that is a really punchy developer, but in 35 probably not good for grain. Any opinions on this approach?
I would just go back to replenished X-Tol. If you want more contrast, increase your development times.
If you want more grain, then Rodinal makes sense.
If you are scanning, you are going to need to use the digital sharpness controls anyways, so you may as well control acutance with them - certainly replenished X-Tol gives you lots of acutance to start with.
Rodinal does have a different look so its worth trying some side by side comparisons to see what fits best for you within your scanning and printing regimen.
My take on this eternal debate is to go standard unless you have a specific aesthetic need that might be better served by pushing the envelope a bit.
Since you're just back after a break may I suggest you shoot two rolls back to back, then develop one standard and the other stand or minimal? No better time than right at the beginning to see the differences so you can make the informed choice in the future for each roll!
My take on this eternal debate is to go standard unless you have a specific aesthetic need that might be better served by pushing the envelope a bit.
Since you're just back after a break may I suggest you shoot two rolls back to back, then develop one standard and the other stand or minimal? No better time than right at the beginning to see the differences so you can make the informed choice in the future for each roll!
Only issue I've ever had with stand is when I tried two reels at once in a Jobo. Got some terrible sprocket drips. Now either I do 1 at a time or a semi stand.