Rodinal for Tmax?

herb

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
404
Format
Medium Format
Having been away from film for about 5 years, I was back into 35mm with Tmax. My old go-to setup was Xtol replenished full strength, for wet printing. Now, I am looking to scan the negs and digitially print. Thus I would have some control over contrast hopefully better than with chemistry. Tempted to try Rodinal, as that is a really punchy developer, but in 35 probably not good for grain. Any opinions on this approach?
 
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
1,881
Location
Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Format
Medium Format
Tmax 100 is gorgeous in Rodinal. The Tmax 100 examples were shot on 120 film, as I usually only shoot 35mm with ISO 400 and higher films.








So is Tmax 400. These are what you're looking for; 35mm examples.








All of the examples I have shown were developed in Rodinal 1+50. Here are the developing times and films speeds I use:

Tmax 100:
EI-50
11 minutes at 68 degrees (20C)

Tmax 400:
EI-320
9 minutes at 68 degrees (20C)
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,244
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format

I used Tmax100 and Rodinal for may years and always had great tonality and exceptionally fine grain, you won't see any significant difference compared to replenished Xtol as both are excellent with Tmax 100 & 400.

Ian
 

Colin Corneau

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
2,366
Location
Winnipeg MB Canada
Format
35mm RF
I use Rodinal for any slower (under 400) speed film. It's always great and a very good match...it'll do very well with TMX in 35mm.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,244
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I use Rodinal for any slower (under 400) speed film. It's always great and a very good match...it'll do very well with TMX in 35mm.

It does so well with 35mm Tmax 100 that some think prints from the negatives were shot on 120 film. I never got the soot and whitewash contrast that Chris seems to get.

IAn
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,289
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I would just go back to replenished X-Tol. If you want more contrast, increase your development times.
If you want more grain, then Rodinal makes sense.
If you are scanning, you are going to need to use the digital sharpness controls anyways, so you may as well control acutance with them - certainly replenished X-Tol gives you lots of acutance to start with.
Rodinal does have a different look so its worth trying some side by side comparisons to see what fits best for you within your scanning and printing regimen.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,678
Format
35mm
Another one for Tmax 100 in Rodinal.

Looks great in 35mm and excellent in 120.
 
OP
OP

herb

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
404
Format
Medium Format
Thanks to all. I will give the Rodinal a shot on my next roll.
 

Kawaiithulhu

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
549
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
stand or standard
My take on this eternal debate is to go standard unless you have a specific aesthetic need that might be better served by pushing the envelope a bit.

Since you're just back after a break may I suggest you shoot two rolls back to back, then develop one standard and the other stand or minimal? No better time than right at the beginning to see the differences so you can make the informed choice in the future for each roll!
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,678
Format
35mm

Only issue I've ever had with stand is when I tried two reels at once in a Jobo. Got some terrible sprocket drips. Now either I do 1 at a time or a semi stand.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…