Rodenstock Rodagon 2.8/50 or Schneider Componon-S 2.8/50?

RedSun · Nov 9, 2012

Both are popular modern enlarger lenses, I do not know which one to choose. I have both. The Rodenstock is heavy. Which one has a better performance?

ic-racer · Nov 9, 2012

The one that is not foggy.

BMbikerider · Nov 9, 2012

I would go for the Rodenstock. Far better build quality and doesn't feel quite so 'plasticky'. If you can get the APO version they are tremendous.

Jesper · Nov 9, 2012

They are both excellent.

RedSun · Nov 9, 2012

BMbikerider said:
I would go for the Rodenstock. Far better build quality and doesn't feel quite so 'plasticky'. If you can get the APO version they are tremendous.

I do have the APO 50mm lens. I'll put it on and give it a try. Not sure if I can tell the differences. I'm not making very large prints now.

craigclu · Nov 9, 2012

Both good glass (I have them, too). I'd stick with the APO if it seems clear and solid. These are known to be best performing at relatively open apertures and I use mine at 5.6 mostly as with my equipment and materials, it gives me about the right exposure times, allowing for some dodging/burning. You will have very little depth of field forgiveness at open apertures, so aligning your enlarger becomes doubly important for extracting what that good APO lens can deliver.

eddie · Nov 9, 2012

If you already have an APO 50mm, why are you looking at getting another 50mm lens?

RedSun · Nov 9, 2012

I have multiple enlargers. They use different mounts. The APO is already mounted on another enlarger. For this one I just received a new mount and is going to replace the Nikkor 50mm with either the Schneider or Rodenstock. Both are good and I have no opinion...

eddie · Nov 9, 2012

Now I understand. I have a few enlargers, too, but I use the same lenses on the different enlargers. I just mount the lens on the appropriate board.

MattKing · Nov 9, 2012

If any of your enlargers are Omega D series, some of the 50mm lenses work better than others with some of the mounting systems.

RedSun · Nov 9, 2012

D5XL is one of them. D5500/ProLabII is another. Both have the turrets.

MattKing · Nov 9, 2012

You have probably seen this resource from KHB, but in case you haven't ...

http://www.khbphotografix.com/omega/LensMountD5.htm

Darkroom317 · Nov 9, 2012

Already been there

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

sandermarijn · Nov 10, 2012

As for the APO vs. non-APO matter, I once looked up and compared their respective performance data (MTF, distortion, fall-off, chromatic aberration). If one thing I learned it would be that stopped down (f/5.6) and at moderate enlargement (10x) there is no discernible difference between the regular Rodagon 50mm f/2.8 and the Apo-N version. The non-APO is a superb lens.

Have a look at the graphs yourself in (there was a url link here which no longer exists).

Adrian Twiss · Nov 10, 2012

I have both and cannot tell them apart.

RedSun · Nov 10, 2012

Yes, they may not make any difference in the range that we do most often. We can't even tell if there is any difference. The difference may show when you try to stretch to large enlargement. But at least we know that both lenses mentioned are superb lenses, or the best in this category.

Rodenstock Rodagon 2.8/50 or Schneider Componon-S 2.8/50?

RedSun

ic-racer

BMbikerider

Jesper

RedSun

craigclu

eddie

RedSun

eddie

MattKing

Moderator

RedSun

MattKing

Moderator

Darkroom317

sandermarijn

Adrian Twiss

RedSun

Rodenstock Rodagon 2.8/50 or Schneider Componon-S 2.8/50?

Moderator

Moderator

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency