• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Rodenstock Omegaron 135mm - What Am I Looking At

igzabeher

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
57
Location
New York City
Format
Multi Format
Because someone will rightfully ask, no, I haven't tried printing with it yet. So no, I don't know how, or if, it affects printing. I'm moving some things around in my darkroom, and won't be able to print for a bit. When I do, I'll report back.

In the meantime, what am I looking at? Separation? A water spot? Fingerprint? One or the horsemen of the apocalypse?

The lens came with an enlarger I recently acquired that had been in storage for who knows how long and under what conditions. Th enlarger itself was in good shape, so I'm thinking whatever it is, wasn't a result of storage conditions, but rather something that predates them. Thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • IMG20230424235038~2.jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 100
Last edited:

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,755
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
From your photo, I'd say that looks like separation.
Possibly from temperature fluctuations in storage?
Rodenstock had an issue with a synthetic lens cement separating at one point in time...(plain Sironar, not "Sironar-N").
Maybe some Omegarons were affected, too?
 

Don_ih

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,569
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
My 150mm Rodenstock enlarging lens has the same affliction. It does not seem to have any impact on enlargement - at least not b&w. Storage conditions could definitely help cause or exacerbate this - freezing and thawing, for instance.
 

BMbikerider

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
3,038
Location
UK
Format
35mm
I had the same idea as well with it being balsam separation.

About 9 years ago I dropped my APO 50mm/2.8 Rodagon into a bucket of water (don't ask!) It was stripped by an independent repairer and cleaned and the diaphragm lubricated and so far there has been no problem with it! Yours may have been the result of creeping dampness over a period of time, alternated with the heat of the bulb creating the start of separation
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,409
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
After Rodenstock moved from balsam lens cement there were issues with some lens designs and separation with their new synthetic optical cement. Around 18 years ago I posted a thread on another forum about a 150mm Sironar lens with similar separation and the reply from a Rodenstock distributor was this occurred where two elements with quite tight radii were cemented together. It only affected Rodenstock lenses made in a relatively short time frame.

The issues had been resolved by the time Rodenstock released the Sironar N & S lenses. I have two Rodagons with separation, one more severe than the other. I've not used them, they came with my De Vere 5108 enlarger, as I already the same or close FL enlarger lenses.

It's more a heat issue with expansion/contraction of differing glass elements, damp if significant would cause rust on the aperture blades first.

Ian