Should say I'm heavily into history...Oregon's revolves significantly around Native genocide...I'm more interested in Native cultural survival and, of course archaeology than forests and landforms.
California was also quite efficient at native genocide.
The indigenous people in Mexico, Central America, and South America didn't have Spanish and Portuguese as their native language any more so than French, Dutch, or German were native to the peoples of Africa.
Etc.
Conquest of land and people is as old as the human race.
I know this is quibbling but there's a technical difference between "conquest of land and people" and formal, enthusiastic mass killing, as in 20th century Europe and 19th century USA and California/Oregon/Arizona (partially at telegraphed command from Washington DC).
My point is that no nation, people, tribe is innocent. While none of what has happened has been good, the best we can do today is act individually to be respectful to all people and work to prevent future atrocities.
That's not nearly valid, far from "the best we can do". The historic horrors in Oregon (and CA) are blithely ignored in Oregon (near total ignorance) , only now being talked about in California. Historic memory is one of the obligations of education.
Germany is honorably committed to making amends for its monstrous history...that's the core reason it's been so open to immigrants. Nations and states (including the Vatican, re the California missions) have moral obligations.
In New Mexico the biggest newspaper (we do read here) publishes relevant stories every week.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?