Momus is right. What the Dutch artist Vermeer knew about lighting portraits 350 years ago is far superior to what studio equipment makers seem to understand today.
I've been experimenting with portraits of late.
I have a 2 light setup with flashes on radio slaves. But i think I need some direct lighting.
I'm a bit bewildered by all the options.. LEDs, macro rings, pop-up donughts, etc.
Can someone recommend a good (inexpensive) option to be used in portraits?
THX
Jim, with all due respect, this comment is a little off. It has nothing to do with what "Studio Equipment makers" are making today...it is entirely about how todays photographers are using it. Any meathead with half a brain can throw up a softbox or Octabank and call themselves a "studio photographer". Profoto and Broncolor for instance, make the highest quality and some of the most well designed equipment. In the hands of a well trained professional, the possibilities of creating amazing artwork (without photoshop) are endless. I have worked as an assistant to several of the finest portrait photographers during my years in New York (in the film days), and I can tell you, they know how to light.
Many photographers who do not know how to light with strobes will regularly tout their ability to light subjects with natural light, and then poo-poo those who use strobe. Don't get me wrong, I do love a naturally lit photograph...generally, those who actually know how to light are also great at natural light.
I agree that many of today's masters do fine work. However, some overinvest in equipment and seem compelled to use too much of it where a little works best. When technique overwhelms the subject, it has gone too far.
"Light, Science and Magic" would be a good book to start with.Darin I suggest if you want to learn how to use flash studio lighting for portraiture and how flash modifiers effect the subject you buy yourself a flash meter, and a good book on the subject from Amazon study it and practice, you aren't going to do it on internet forums however well intentioned the answers to your question.
I agree that many of today's masters do fine work. However, some overinvest in equipment and seem compelled to use too much of it where a little works best. When technique overwhelms the subject, it has gone too far.
I have this book Matt and I agree."Light, Science and Magic" would be a good book to start with.
Momus is right. What the Dutch artist Vermeer knew about lighting portraits 350 years ago is far superior to what studio equipment makers seem to understand today.
I've been experimenting with portraits of late.
I have a 2 light setup with flashes on radio slaves. But i think I need some direct lighting.
I'm a bit bewildered by all the options.. LEDs, macro rings, pop-up donughts, etc.
Can someone recommend a good (inexpensive) option to be used in portraits?
THX
a large window and a good book such as George Hurrell's Hollywood Portraits
George Hurrel's portraits were highly stylized using multiple lights and lighting modifiers https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=...eorge+hurrel&gs_l=img.1.6.0l10.2561.8804.0.15a large window and a good book such as George Hurrell's Hollywood Portraits
a beauty dish is a good option but not cheapI've been experimenting with portraits of late.
I have a 2 light setup with flashes on radio slaves. But i think I need some direct lighting.
I'm a bit bewildered by all the options.. LEDs, macro rings, pop-up donughts, etc.
Can someone recommend a good (inexpensive) option to be used in portraits?
THX
I agree there's nothing quite as pretty as window light... when you want window light!
Wondering about all the negative comments for someone who wants to try something more like studio lighting.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?