Ricoh 500 any good?

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 6
  • 7
  • 138
Couples

A
Couples

  • 4
  • 0
  • 103
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 6
  • 4
  • 141

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,059
Messages
2,785,577
Members
99,792
Latest member
sepd123
Recent bookmarks
0

filmamigo

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
315
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
I think it’s a lovely camera - but 125 is a bit steep.

The camera has everything I wanted in a fixed lens rangefinder. A good, largish, viewfinder with decent rangefinder patch size and brightness. It’s good proper manual shutter and aperture controls. The 45mm focal length suits me.

The winder is in the bottom. It looks odd (like a Leicavit) but works fine. It’s a bit sharp and uncomfortable in the cold.

I find the f2.8 lens to be a bit lacking in contrast, and not the sharpest. Folks report better results from the much rarer high speed versions, the 519 and the Jet, both with an f1.9 lens.

125 might be worth it to you if the camera ticks ALL your boxes, and it’s in perfect working condition. After all, it’s not crazy money when compared to a much more problematic Yashica Electro 35 or the comparatively fragile Canonette 28.
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
I acquired one about 3 month ago and have shot a couple of rolls of Tmax through it. It has a nice, solid feel and a VG viewfinder. No complaints about the lens performance but not a "wow" either. I agree that, at least to me, $125 is high. I paid quite a bit less. But I don't know what 's typical in terms of pricing.
 

albada

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Escondido, C
Format
35mm RF
These came with two kinds of lenses, the "Riken Ricoh" and "Riken Ricomat". One is 4-element and the other 5-element, and I can't remember which is which. A careful examination of the reflections in the front and rear elements will tell you. Anyway, the sharpness should be fine at f/4.8 or smaller. Also, I would not pay more than $50 for one in clean condition. Watch out for oil on the blades, making the shutter sluggish or sticky. Most of these have oily blades.

Mark Overton
 

Fixcinater

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2008
Messages
2,500
Location
San Diego, CA
Format
Medium Format
I had a 500G, much more traditional layout. You can find those at lower price points.
 

michr

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
440
Format
Multi Format
I had a Ricoh 500. I enjoyed using the camera a lot, especially because of the rocking focus arms and the bottom winder. But my example would tear out sprocket holes, sometimes tearing out all of the holes in a section and making it unwindable, so I sold it. I wouldn't pay more than $40 for a fully functional version. I'm keeping an eye out for the 519 instead.
 

albada

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Escondido, C
Format
35mm RF
I had a Ricoh 500. I enjoyed using the camera a lot, especially because of the rocking focus arms and the bottom winder. But my example would tear out sprocket holes, sometimes tearing out all of the holes in a section and making it unwindable, so I sold it. I wouldn't pay more than $40 for a fully functional version. I'm keeping an eye out for the 519 instead.

I would guess that the rewind shaft was stiff and needed a bit lube, creating so much resistance that the holes tore. You can apply a small drop of oil to the bottom of the shaft with the back off. When it rotates freely, I've found that there's little resistance and thus no tearing of holes.

Mark Overton
 

John Earley

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
423
Location
Central Virginia
Format
Multi Format
I have two of the 500's and one 35. There is a good bit of info here . http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?Ricoh500.html~mainFrame

I agree with what has been said above. Nice viewfinder/rangefinder and ok lens.
15262374189_9752711b0e_z.jpg
 

michr

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
440
Format
Multi Format
I would guess that the rewind shaft was stiff and needed a bit lube, creating so much resistance that the holes tore. You can apply a small drop of oil to the bottom of the shaft with the back off. When it rotates freely, I've found that there's little resistance and thus no tearing of holes.

Mark Overton
I've been concerned that I'd buy another one with the same problem, so this is helpful advice.
 

outwest

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
565
Format
Multi Format
Many moons ago I bought one of these for $2, cleaned it up and starting shooting. I entered a print made from one of its negs into a camera store contest and won 1st place with a $100 store credit. I used that to buy a 4x5. You can really get moving with that trigger winder!
 

Russ - SVP

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
755
Location
Washington
Format
35mm
I've been offered an old viewfinder camera: Ricoh 500. Owner was bit unsure, but he seems to want around $125. It looks really nice.

I believe it looked exactly like this:
https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.YZXt-VFyq1jp6Y4bi62oXgHaFj&pid=15.1&f=1


I have to admit I was a bit confused by the winding mechanism etc, but I am intrigued. Do these things come with a good type of lens?

Not a bad little Camera. I have one. But that one is way overpriced.

Russ
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom