JackRosa
Allowing Ads
I haven't experienced problems with stained negatives. Either tanol, finol, pyrocat, PMK or 510pyro.
As wild guess your problems may come from the change on your development more than by the stain itself.
Exactly. Also there it was a FAQ section about it in the old RH site.
I guess that's because it reads it as plain density, but cannot assure as I don't know about the internals of this meter, it works ok to me and that's all what I'm concerned about.
When I started out with it I did some calibrations that brought what seemed erratic results to me, so I repeated them with similar results. Then I learned two things: 1) judging those strips accurately isn't that easy as it seems when you're fine tuning 2) what was erratic was my early way of metering, I started to use the densitometer mode to check up the general contrast and my metering points helped to get used to the machine.
my 2c, hope it helps
....... The silver-stain relationship seems to be influenced by changes in agitation. This is probably due to the way pyro quickly oxidizes and thus the activity of the staining developing agent declines in proportion to the activity of the second non-staining agent over the course of development. As development proceeds the density in the highlights (dense negative) builds more quickly in proportion to the density in the shadows (clear negative). As a result the ratio of stain to silver is different in the highlights and shadows.
Developers that oxidize more slowly will give more consistent results - PMK and PyroCat are two good choices.....................
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?