use a piece of velco. a piece on the flasher and a piece on the lens board.
then the equipment will be at the same height of the orginal exposure and youi wouldn't have to move the head.
I stuck a piece of board onto the back of mine so that it slides in and out of my Multigrade filter holderFirst, allow me to get in my brief gloat over having just placed my order for a StopClock Professional, Zonemaster II and Paper Flasher. Thanks for the tax refund check, Uncle Sam.
Now 2 questions about the paper flasher.
Is it important to flash paper from a consistant height?
Assuming so, how have paper flasher owners solved that? I want my flashing to be consistant, regardless of where the enlarger head is for any given print. I don't want to be moving the head once I've composed a print on the easel. So I'm envisioning some mechanism for positioning the flasher at the same height all the time, independent of the enlarger head's position. I don't have the luxury of a separate enlarger or copy stand for this purpose. I'm thinking about a wall mounted swing arm.
Jstraw - I do as Ann does, then carry out a quick test strip to work out the flash/ fog exposure. I guess that if you do fix it somewhere that it will stay constant, then you will only have to do the test strip once for each paper, then use this value everytime, but my darkroom is too small to have a fixed flashing area, it really only takes a few extra seconds each time.
I took a piece of plexiglas and added some legs about a foot long (maybe 18 in....not home right now) that fold up. It is big enough to fit over my easel. The flasher is them placed on the plex. I made the legs as short as I could and still get even illumination. For awhile I just used the rights sized cardboard box and cut a hole in it...that worked fine too.
I did it mostly because I am lazy and don't want to figure out flash times......btw, I am only pre-flashing, but I don't see how that would make a difference except in the time used.
Mark
This may be a dumb question, but if people are mounting this device to the lensboard region (which varies each time a print is made) and having to test strip each print, why bother using the device at all? Why would you not just use the enlarger to flash the paper, especially when it is mentioned by gainer that you'd want the same color temp in the light sources?
Tim
Hmmm...I wonder if the Zonemaster II print meter could be used to determine adjustments in the duration of the flashing exposure so that they can be consistant with the flasher at any height.
I can determing a flashing exposure for a given paper at a given height. If I can meter that output so that the Zonemaster II indicates that this produces a given zone on it's scale, if I raise or lower the head, I'd just need to determine the changed flashing exposure duration to achieve the same zone from that new position.
Does that make sense?
It might also be possible, if the lattitude involved is sufficient, to just do tests for flashing exposure for each paper I use, at one or two inch increments and make a chart. Then I could just flash for the nearest charted height to the actual height.
If your flasher has variable intensity, you can use the Zonemaster just as I do with my home made apparatus. Leave the flasher on at minimum intensity while using the Zonemaster meter to adjust Zone 1 or 2 using the enlarging lens and exposure time as you would were you not using flashing. Use the flasher intensity to adjust Zone 7 or 8 to suit the Zonemaster. Now check the shadow. You will see that the Zonemaster reading has not changed significantly. All you need is a switched outlet into which you plug both the flasher and the enlarger so that both are either on or off together.
The best you can do by flashing is to add enough light so that the places where you want Zone 7 0r 8 are exposed just slightly more than the threshold of the printing material. Adding a certain amount of overall light will not add the same density increment to both high and low because of the logarithmic function involved. The log of 1 + 1 is 0.3 while the log of 10 + 1 is 1.04. This reasoning assumes that you want to add the minimum light to bring some detail into the highlights. If you just want to darken a certain area, you are netter off with dodging/burning.
It is neither pre- nor post-flashing, but while-flashing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?