I own an RH Design Analyzer Pro and I've really enjoyed the product. To calibrate the contrast at different grades, the manual has the user contact print a Stouffer 21 Step Wedge onto their paper of choice and then find the difference between 0.04 and 90% dmax. This results in an ISO(R) number that can be plugged into the device and also used for sensitometry analysis.
I'm new to sensitometry and I'm currently reading Beyond The Zone System. In BTZS, Davis discusses the Callier Effect and says that contact printing a wedge will yield less contrasty results than projection printing. If this is the case, would it make the recommended calibration of the Analyzer Pro inaccurate? Or is there some sort of pre-programmed offset to account for the increased contrast when projection printing with my condenser enlarger? I'm also assuming that sensitometry data and graphs gleaned those test strips is completely useless if I'll be using the paper for enlarging. Is this correct?
I'm new to sensitometry and I'm currently reading Beyond The Zone System. In BTZS, Davis discusses the Callier Effect and says that contact printing a wedge will yield less contrasty results than projection printing. If this is the case, would it make the recommended calibration of the Analyzer Pro inaccurate? Or is there some sort of pre-programmed offset to account for the increased contrast when projection printing with my condenser enlarger? I'm also assuming that sensitometry data and graphs gleaned those test strips is completely useless if I'll be using the paper for enlarging. Is this correct?
